Outsider bias: how your name influences the peer review process
- 19 September 2022
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Heart
- Vol. 99 (1172), 514-515
- https://doi.org/10.1136/pmj-2022-142046
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Unconscious Bias in Peer ReviewClinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 2020
- Pride and prejudice – What can we learn from peer review?Medical Teacher, 2020
- Bias in the Peer Review ProcessObstetrics & Gynecology, 2019
- Interventions designed to reduce implicit prejudices and implicit stereotypes in real world contexts: a systematic reviewBMC Psychology, 2019
- Improving the thermostability and stress tolerance of an archaeon hyperthermophilic superoxide dismutase by fusion with a unique N-terminal domainSpringerPlus, 2016
- Representation of Women as Authors, Reviewers, Editors in Chief, and Editorial Board Members at 6 General Medical Journals in 2010 and 2011JAMA Internal Medicine, 2014
- Differences in citation rates by country of origin for papers published in top-ranked medical journals: do they reflect inequalities in access to publication?Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 2009
- Predictors of publication: characteristics of submitted manuscripts associated with acceptance at major biomedical journalsThe Medical Journal of Australia, 2006
- Effect of Blinded Peer Review on Abstract AcceptanceJAMA, 2006
- Language bias discredits the peer-review systemNature, 1999