Rapid syntactic adaptation in self-paced reading: Detectable, but only with many participants.
- 1 July 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Psychological Association (APA) in Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
- Vol. 47 (7), 1156-1172
- https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001046
Abstract
Temporarily ambiguous sentences that are disambiguated in favor of a less preferred parse are read more slowly than their unambiguous counterparts. This slowdown is referred to as a garden path effect. Recent self- paced reading studies have found that this effect decreased over the course of the experiment as participants were exposed to such syntactically ambiguous sentences. This decrease in the magnitude of the effect has been interpreted as evidence that readers calibrate their expectations to the context; this minimizes their surprise when they encounter these initially unexpected syntactic structures. Such recalibration of syntactic expectations, referred to as syntactic adaptation, is only one possible explanation for the decrease in garden path effect, however; this decrease could also be driven instead by increased familiarity with the self-paced reading paradigm (task adaptation). The goal of this article is to adjudicate between these two explanations. In a large between-group study (n = 642), we find evidence for syntactic adaptation over and above task adaptation. The magnitude of syntactic adaptation compared to task adaptation is very small, however. Power analyses show that a large number of participants is required to detect, with adequate power, syntactic adaptation in future between-subjects self- paced reading studies. This issue is exacerbated in experiments designed to detect modulations of the basic syntactic adaptation effect; such experiments are likely to be underpowered even with more than 1,200 participants. We conclude that while, contrary to recent suggestions, syntactic adaptation can be detected using self-paced reading, this paradigm is not very effective for studying this phenomenon.This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- brms: An R Package for Bayesian Multilevel Models Using StanJournal of Statistical Software, 2017
- The role of verb repetition in cumulative structural priming in comprehension.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2016
- Rapid Expectation Adaptation during Syntactic ComprehensionPLOS ONE, 2013
- The effect of word predictability on reading time is logarithmicCognition, 2013
- Residualization is not the answer: Rethinking how to address multicollinearitySocial Science Research, 2012
- Statistical learning and language acquisitionWIREs Cognitive Science, 2010
- Experience and sentence processing: Statistical learning and relative clause comprehensionCognitive Psychology, 2009
- Are unshifted distributional models appropriate for response time?Psychometrika, 2005
- Eye-Fixation Patterns of High- and Low-Span Young and Older Adults: Down the Garden Path and Back Again.Psychology and Aging, 2004
- The use of thematic role information in parsing: Syntactic processing autonomy revisitedJournal of Memory and Language, 2003