“I don’t regret it at all. It’s just I wish the process had a bit more humanity to it … a bit more holistic”: a qualitative, community-led medication abortion study with Black and Latinx Women in Georgia, USA
Open Access
- 11 November 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis Ltd in Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters
- Vol. 30 (1), 2129686
- https://doi.org/10.1080/26410397.2022.2129686
Abstract
Traditional family planning research has excluded Black and Latinx leaders, and little is known about medication abortion (MA) among racial/ethnic minorities, although it is an increasingly vital reproductive health service, particularly after the fall of Roe v. Wade. Reproductive justice (RJ) community-based organisation (CBO) SisterLove led a study on Black and Latinx women’s MA perceptions and experiences in Georgia. From April 2019 to December 2020, we conducted key informant interviews with 20 abortion providers and CBO leaders and 32 in-depth interviews and 6 focus groups (n = 30) with Black and Latinx women. We analysed data thematically using a team-based, iterative approach of coding, memo-ing, and discussion. Participants described multilevel barriers to and strategies for MA access, wishing that “the process had a bit more humanity … [it] should be more holistic.” Barriers included (1) sociocultural factors (intersectional oppression, intersectional stigma, and medical experimentation); (2) national and state policies; (3) clinic- and provider-related factors (lack of diverse clinic staff, long waiting times); and (4) individual-level factors (lack of knowledge and social support). Suggested solutions included (1) social media campaigns and story-sharing; (2) RJ-based policy advocacy; (3) diversifying clinic staff, offering flexible scheduling and fees, community integration of abortion, and RJ abortion funds; and (4) social support (including abortion doulas) and comprehensive sex education. Findings suggest that equitable MA access for Black and Latinx communities in the post-Roe era will require multi-level intervention, informed by community-led evidence production; holistic, de-medicalised, and human rights-based care models; and intersectional RJ policy advocacy.Keywords
Funding Information
- Society of Family Planning Research Fund
- anonymous foundation
- Collaborative for Gender and Reproductive Equity
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reproductive JusticeAnnual Review of Law and Social Science, 2013
- Disparities in Abortion Rates: A Public Health ApproachAmerican Journal of Public Health, 2013
- The Stigma of Having an Abortion: Development of a Scale and Characteristics of Women Experiencing Abortion StigmaPerspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 2013
- Stigma Experienced by People Living with HIV/AIDSPublished by Springer Science and Business Media LLC ,2013
- Dynamics of stigma in abortion work: Findings from a pilot study of the Providers Share WorkshopSocial Science & Medicine (1982), 2011
- Abortion Stigma: A Reconceptualization of Constituents, Causes, and ConsequencesWomen's Health Issues, 2011
- Access to Abortion Services: A Neglected Health DisparityJournal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 2011
- Efficacy, acceptability and safety of medication abortion in low-income, urban Latina womenContraception, 2009
- Conceptualising abortion stigmaCulture, Health & Sexuality, 2009
- Conceptualizing StigmaAnnual Review of Sociology, 2001