Ownership structure and corporate social responsibility in India: empirical investigation of an emerging market
- 11 January 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Emerald in Review of International Business and Strategy
- Vol. 31 (4), 540-555
- https://doi.org/10.1108/ribs-07-2020-0077
Abstract
Previous studies have examined the relationship between institutional investors and corporate social responsibility (CSR) engagement primarily for the case of developed nations. The purpose of this paper is to look at the association between different ownership categories and CSR spending of selected Indian firms within an emerging market context. This study examines the motivations that guide the CSR strategies of different ownership groups. Random-effects Tobit panel regression is performed on a panel of BSE-listed non-financial Indian firms panel comprising of 5,313 firm year observations over a six-year period (2014-2019). Heterogeneous behavior of institutional investors is revealed through the study. Different categories of institutional investors have different preferences for CSR spending of a firm. Lending institutes and foreign institutional investors (FIIs) are seen to support the CSR investments. However, mutual fund investors are seen to not influence the CSR spend by the firms. Further, the results show that family ownership, measured in terms of family shareholding, positively moderates the lending institutions and mutual funds toward CSR and does not impact the FIIs decision regarding the CSR investments. The analysis has implications for both institutional investors and multinational firms. In the emerging market context, managers and owners who target long term strategies such as CSR, will benefit from increasing shareholdings of creditors (lending institutions). They can also take steps to improve their transparency and corporate governance structure so as to attract the foreign institutional investments. Managers cannot ignore the heterogeneities of institutional investors in their investment decisions and hence CSR decisions need to align with those of different types of investors. This study adds to the existing literature by offering new empirical insights from the perspective of an emerging market, India.Keywords
This publication has 64 references indexed in Scilit:
- Stakeholder Pressure on MNEs and the Transfer of Socially Irresponsible Practices to SubsidiariesThe Academy of Management Journal, 2013
- Institutional Dynamics and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in an Emerging Country Context: Evidence from ChinaJournal of Business Ethics, 2012
- The Effect of Ownership Structure on Corporate Social Responsibility: Empirical Evidence from KoreaJournal of Business Ethics, 2011
- Family firm research: sketching a research fieldInternational Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 2011
- Are family ownership and control in large firms good, bad, or irrelevant?Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 2010
- Socioemotional Wealth and Corporate Responses to Institutional Pressures: Do Family-Controlled Firms Pollute Less?Administrative Science Quarterly, 2010
- Corporate Social Responsibility and Long-term Compensation: Evidence from CanadaJournal of Business Ethics, 2005
- Variations in ownership behavior and propensity to diversify: a study of the Indian corporate contextStrategic Management Journal, 2002
- Corporate Social Responsibility: a Theory of the Firm PerspectiveAcademy of Management Review, 2001
- Is Group Affiliation Profitable in Emerging Markets? An Analysis of Diversified Indian Business GroupsThe Journal of Finance, 2000