The impact of COVID‐19 on primary health care delivery in Australia
Open Access
- 23 September 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Advanced Nursing
- Vol. 78 (5), 1327-1336
- https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.15046
Abstract
Aims To validate the ‘safe and effective staffing tool’ and explore the impact of COVID-19 on the quality of Australian primary health care (PHC). Design A national survey was conducted from October to December 2020. Methods The online survey was distributed via social media and professional organisations to PHC nurses. Results Three-hundred fifty-nine PHC nurses participated. A two-factor solution was found with factors named; ‘Perception of quality of care provided’ and ‘Personal satisfaction with care delivered’. Cronbach's alpha demonstrated good internal consistency for the total scale (α = .915) and each subscale (α = .879/α = .864). Nearly three-quarters of participants (71.3%) were satisfied with the quality of care they delivered. Participants working in general practice, and those with more nursing experience had significantly higher scores in the factor ‘perceptions of quality of care provided’ and the total ‘quality and satisfaction with care’. A lack of time, inadequate supervision and support, and performing non-nursing duties were reported to be impacting care quality. Most participants (80.5%) reported that COVID-19 had impacted negatively on the detection and management of non-COVID related health conditions. Conclusion The ‘safe and effective staffing tool’ is a valid and reliable measure of perceived quality of care and satisfaction with care delivered. Many PHC nurses perceive that there has been an overall reduction in the quality of care delivered due to COVID-19 and feel that there is a lack of adequate supervision and workplace support. Given the limited baseline data, further research is required to understand the extent that COVID-19 impacts these findings. However, this study demonstrates that strategies need to be implemented to support PHC nurses to provide high-quality care to optimise health outcomes and maintain nurse satisfaction. Impact This is the first attempt to evaluate care quality in Australian PHC. Policymaking requires this evidence to drive changes to better support PHC nurses.Keywords
Funding Information
- Australian College of Nursing
- University of Wollongong
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Predictors of job satisfaction among nurses working in Ethiopian public hospitals, 2014: institution-based cross-sectional studyHuman Resources for Health, 2017
- A qualitative study of collaboration in general practice: understanding the general practice nurse's roleJournal of Clinical Nursing, 2017
- The development of professional practice standards for Australian general practice nursesJournal of Advanced Nursing, 2017
- An integrative review of facilitators and barriers influencing collaboration and teamwork between general practitioners and nurses working in general practiceJournal of Advanced Nursing, 2015
- The evolution of nursing in Australian general practice: a comparative analysis of workforce surveys ten years onBMC Family Practice, 2014
- Nursing practice environment, quality of care, and morale of hospital nurses in JapanNursing & Health Sciences, 2013
- Organisational quality, nurse staffing and the quality of chronic disease management in primary care: Observational study using routinely collected dataInternational Journal of Nursing Studies, 2011
- The short‐form version of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS‐21): Construct validity and normative data in a large non‐clinical sampleBritish Journal of Clinical Psychology, 2005
- You want to measure coping but your protocol’ too long: Consider the brief copeInternational Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 1997
- The Application of Electronic Computers to Factor AnalysisEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1960