Reasons Things Happen for a Reason: An Integrative Theory of Teleology
- 14 September 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Perspectives on Psychological Science
- Vol. 17 (2), 452-464
- https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691621995753
Abstract
Humans default to functions and purposes when asked to explain the existence of mysterious phenomena. Our penchant for teleological reasoning is associated with good outcomes, such as finding meaning in misfortune, but also with bad outcomes, such as dangerous conspiracy theories and misunderstood scientific ideas, both of which pose important social and health problems. Psychological research into the teleological default has long alluded to Daniel Dennett’s intentional-systems theory but has not fully engaged with the three intellectual stances at its core (intentional, design, physical). This article distinguishes the intentional stance from the design stance, which untangles some of the present knots in theories of teleology, accounts for diverse forms of teleology, and enhances predictions of when teleological reasoning is more likely to occur. This article examines the evidence for a teleological default considering Dennett’s intentional-systems theory, proposes a process model, and clarifies current theoretical debates. It argues that people rationally and often thoughtfully use teleological reasoning in relation to both cognitive and social psychological factors. Implications for theory and future research are discussed.This publication has 94 references indexed in Scilit:
- fMRI reveals reciprocal inhibition between social and physical cognitive domainsNeuroImage, 2013
- The Coexistence of Natural and Supernatural Explanations Across Cultures and DevelopmentChild Development, 2012
- Teleological Reasoning in 4-Month-Old Infants: Pupil Dilations and Contextual ConstraintsPLOS ONE, 2011
- Infants attribute goals even to biomechanically impossible actionsCognition, 2008
- Was it designed to do that? Children’s focus on intended function in their conceptualization of artifactsCognition, 2008
- What Do Children Want to Know About Animals and Artifacts?Psychological Science, 2006
- The Meaning Maintenance Model: On the Coherence of Social MotivationsPersonality and Social Psychology Review, 2006
- How do parents respond to children's questions about the identity of artifacts?Developmental Science, 2005
- The misunderstood limits of folk science: an illusion of explanatory depthCognitive Science, 2002
- The Future Is Now: Temporal Correction in Affective ForecastingOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2002