Association Between Broadband Capacity and Social Vulnerability Factors in the United States: A County-Level Spatial Analysis
- 1 December 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Mary Ann Liebert Inc in Population Health Management
- Vol. 25 (6), 798-806
- https://doi.org/10.1089/pop.2022.0189
Abstract
This study evaluated relationships between county-level social vulnerability and broadband access using spatial clustering and regression approaches. County-level broadband availability (Federal Communications Commission [FCC] and Microsoft; 2019–2020), social vulnerability (COVID-19 Community Vulnerability Index [CCVI]; 2020), and primary care access (Area Health Resource File; 2019–2020) data sets were used. Two measures of broadband availability were considered: (1) Microsoft system-reported proportion of county population with broadband and (2) difference in FCC-reported and Microsoft-reported proportions of county population with broadband. Cluster maps were constructed using local Moran's I, and spatial Durbin models were estimated using primary care shortage designation and CCVI themes (socioeconomic status, minority status, housing/transportation/disability, epidemiological risk, health care system, high-risk environment, and population density). Among 3102 counties, county-level broadband coverage varied widely between Microsoft (0.39) and FCC (0.84), with greater coverage in the East and West, and larger discrepancies between FCC and Microsoft data in the South and Appalachia. In spatial regressions, a one-point increase in socioeconomic status vulnerability (0—least; 10—most vulnerable), was associated with a 2.0 percentage point (pp) reduction in broadband access (P < 0.001). Similar inverse relationships were observed with housing, epidemiological, and health care system variables. There were greater divergences between FCC and Microsoft measures with each one-point increase in socioeconomic status (1.4 pp), epidemiological risk (0.6 pp), and health care system (0.7 pp) vulnerability. More vulnerable counties had lower broadband and larger divergences between FCC and Microsoft data. Broadband is necessary for utilizing telehealth services; careful considerations in measuring broadband access can facilitate policies that improve equitable access to care.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Satisfaction with the use of telehealth during COVID-19: An integrative reviewInternational Journal of Nursing Studies Advances, 2020
- The role of telehealth during COVID-19 outbreak: a systematic review based on current evidenceBMC Public Health, 2020
- Broadband Internet Access Is a Social Determinant of Health!American Journal of Public Health, 2020
- Beyond broadband: digital inclusion as a driver of inequities in access to rural cancer careJournal of Cancer Survivorship, 2020
- Digital Divide: Marked Disparities in Computer and Broadband Internet Use and Associated Health Inequalities in the United StatesInternational Journal of Translational Medical Research and Public Health, 2020
- Association Between Broadband Internet Availability and Telemedicine UseJAMA Internal Medicine, 2019
- The Limitations of Poor Broadband Internet Access for Telemedicine Use in Rural America: An Observational StudyAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2019
- Trends in Telemedicine Use in a Large Commercially Insured Population, 2005-2017JAMA, 2018
- Local Indicators of Spatial Association-LISAGeographical Analysis, 2010
- Applied Spatial Econometrics: Raising the BarSpatial Economic Analysis, 2010