A revised analysis of ferrihydrite at liquid helium temperature using Mössbauer spectroscopy
- 1 August 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Mineralogical Society of America in American Mineralogist: Journal of Earth and Planetary Materials
- Vol. 107 (8), 1643-1651
- https://doi.org/10.2138/am-2021-7802
Abstract
Short-range-ordered Fe(III) minerals such as ferrihydrite (Fh) are ubiquitous in the environment, are key players in biogeochemical cycling, and sorb trace elements and nutrients. As such, it is important to be able to identify the presence of such minerals in natural samples. Fh is commonly observed to be X-ray amorphous and cannot be easily analyzed using X-ray diffraction, meaning that spectroscopic methods such as X-ray absorption or Fe-57 Mossbauer spectroscopy (MBS) are necessary for accurate identification and quantification. Despite decades of research into Fh using MBS, there is a discrepancy in the literature about the exact parameters applicable to the mineral when measured at liquid helium temperature. Fh is frequently fitted with either one, two, or three hyperfine sextets with little interpretation applied to the meaning of each, which is problematic as a one sextet model does not account for the asymmetric lineshape frequently observed for Fh. Here, we address inconsistencies in the fitting of Fh and provide a more standardized approach to its identification by MBS. We present a systematic comparison of diferent fitting methods, notably based on Lorentzian and Voigt functions. We suggest that the most suitable approach to fitting pure Fh at liquid helium temperature is with two sextets (A and B) fitted using an extended Voigt-based function with the ability to apply probability distributions to each hyperfine parameter. 2-line Fh: A (delta = 0.49 mm/s; epsilon = 0.00 mm/s; B-hf = 50.1 T) and B (delta = 0.42 mm/s; epsilon = -0.01 mm/s; B-hf = 46.8 T) 6-line Fh: A (delta = 0.50 mm/s; epsilon = -0.03 mm/s; B-hf = 50.2 T) and B (delta = 0.40 mm/s; epsilon = -0.05 mm/s; B-hf = 47.1 T). We interpret the two sextets to be due to either diferences in the coordination environment of iron, i.e., in tetrahedral or octahedral sites, the presence of a disordered surface phase, or a combination of both. We hope that provoking a discussion on the use of MBS for Fh will help develop a greater understanding of this mineral, and other short-range ordered iron minerals, which are so important in environmental processes.Keywords
This publication has 44 references indexed in Scilit:
- A disordered nanoparticle model for 6-line ferrihydriteAmerican Mineralogist: Journal of Earth and Planetary Materials, 2013
- Critical evaluation of the revised akdalaite model for ferrihydriteAmerican Mineralogist: Journal of Earth and Planetary Materials, 2011
- Mössbauer spectroscopy of clays, soils and their mineral constituentsClay Minerals, 2010
- Ordered ferrimagnetic form of ferrihydrite reveals links among structure, composition, and magnetismProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2010
- Magnetic properties of synthetic six-line ferrihydrite nanoparticlesPhysics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 2006
- Geomicrobiological Cycling of IronReviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, 2005
- Structural and Magnetic Properties of FerrihydriteClays and Clay Minerals, 1992
- Single-crystal Mössbauer study of phlogopite micaCanadian Journal of Physics, 1990
- New Data and a Revised Structural Model for FerrihydriteClays and Clay Minerals, 1988
- Cation Distribution, Mössbauer Spectra, and Magnetic Properties of FerripyrophylliteClays and Clay Minerals, 1984