Outcomes of flexible uretrorenoscopy for solitary renal stones up to 15 mm, hits and misses: A single-surgeon experience
Open Access
- 1 January 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Medknow in Urology Annals
- Vol. 13 (3), 258-262
- https://doi.org/10.4103/ua.ua_51_20
Abstract
Introduction: In this study, we retrospectively evaluated the outcomes of flexible uretrorenoscopy (fURS) for removal of solitary renal stones sized up to 15 mm. Material and Methods: We evaluated the data of 115 patients who underwent fURS at our unit between Jan 2018 and Dec 2019. All fURS were performed by a single surgeon using Flex-2 flexiscope. Ureteral Access sheath (UAS) of size 9/11 fr was used in all patients. Stones were fragmented using 20 watts laser. Few fragments were retrieved using Nitinol zero tip basket for assessment of the passability of remaining dust and sent for stone analysis. Data pertaining to demographic characteristics, stone size, stone site, operative time, intra and post operative complications were retrieved from the records. Results: Of the 115 patients who underwent fURS, 71 (61.7%) were male and 44 (38.2%) were female. Average age of patients was 32.9±8.9 years; the average body mass index was 22.9±3.9 kg/m2. Average size of the stone was 11.0±1.5 × 10.2±1.3 mm. The stone free rates at the end of 3 weeks and 3 months were 97% and 99%, respectively. Conclusion: fURS is an effective minimally-invasive procedure for removal of single stones up to 15 mm in size. We observed minimal morbidity rates and acceptable stone free rates in our series.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Future perspectives of flexible ureteroscopyCurrent Opinion in Urology, 2019
- Retrograde intrarenal surgery: An expanding role in treatment of urolithiasisAsian Journal of Urology, 2018
- First clinical evaluation of a new single-use flexible ureteroscope (LithoVue™): a European prospective multicentric feasibility studyWorld Journal of Urology, 2016
- Comparison of New Single-Use Digital Flexible Ureteroscope Versus Nondisposable Fiber Optic and Digital Ureteroscope in a Cadaveric ModelJournal of Endourology, 2016
- Current Standard Technique for Modern Flexible Ureteroscopy: Tips and TricksEuropean Urology, 2016
- Laboratory AssessmentUrologia Internationalis, 2007
- The evolution and progress of ureteroscopyUrologic Clinics of North America, 2004
- LOWER POLE I: A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCK WAVE LITHOTRIPSY AND PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROSTOLITHOTOMY FOR LOWER POLE NEPHROLITHIASIS—INITIAL RESULTSJournal of Urology, 2001
- Is There a Simpler Method for Predicting Lower Pole Stone Clearance after Shockwave Lithotripsy than Measuring Infundibulopelvic Angle?Journal of Endourology, 2000
- Management of Lower Pole Nephrolithiasis: A Critical AnalysisJournal of Urology, 1994