Towards a compound-event-oriented climate model evaluation: a decomposition of the underlying biases in multivariate fire and heat stress hazards
Open Access
- 17 June 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Copernicus GmbH in Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences
- Vol. 21 (6), 1867-1885
- https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-1867-2021
Abstract
Climate models' outputs are affected by biases that need to be detected and adjusted to model climate impacts. Many climate hazards and climate-related impacts are associated with the interaction between multiple drivers, i.e. by compound events. So far climate model biases are typically assessed based on the hazard of interest, and it is unclear how much a potential bias in the dependence of the hazard drivers contributes to the overall bias and how the biases in the drivers interact. Here, based on copula theory, we develop a multivariate bias-assessment framework, which allows for disentangling the biases in hazard indicators in terms of the underlying univariate drivers and their statistical dependence. Based on this framework, we dissect biases in fire and heat stress hazards in a suite of global climate models by considering two simplified hazard indicators: the wet-bulb globe temperature (WBGT) and the Chandler burning index (CBI). Both indices solely rely on temperature and relative humidity. The spatial pattern of the hazard indicators is well represented by climate models. However, substantial biases exist in the representation of extreme conditions, especially in the CBI (spatial average of absolute bias: 21 ∘C) due to the biases driven by relative humidity (20 ∘C). Biases in WBGT (1.1 ∘C) are small compared to the biases driven by temperature (1.9 ∘C) and relative humidity (1.4 ∘C), as the two biases compensate for each other. In many regions, also biases related to the statistical dependence (0.85 ∘C) are important for WBGT, which indicates that well-designed physically based multivariate bias adjustment procedures should be considered for hazards and impacts that depend on multiple drivers. The proposed compound-event-oriented evaluation of climate model biases is easily applicable to other hazard types. Furthermore, it can contribute to improved present and future risk assessments through increasing our understanding of the biases' sources in the simulation of climate impacts.Funding Information
- European Research Council (339390)
- Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (PD/BD/114481/2016)
- Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (186282, 179876)
- Universidad de Costa Rica (NA)
- Newcastle University (NA)
This publication has 43 references indexed in Scilit:
- Robust projections of combined humidity and temperature extremesNature Climate Change, 2012
- An Overview of CMIP5 and the Experiment DesignBulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 2012
- Atmospheric conservation properties in ERA‐InterimQuarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 2011
- The ERA‐Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation systemQuarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 2011
- UTCI-Fiala multi-node model of human heat transfer and temperature regulationInternational Journal of Biometeorology, 2011
- Spatial autocorrelation and statistical tests: Some solutionsJournal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, 2009
- Testing for equality between two copulasJournal of Multivariate Analysis, 2008
- On the Use of Copulas in Hydrology: Theory and PracticeJournal of Hydrologic Engineering, 2007
- The influence of autocorrelation on the ability to detect trend in hydrological seriesHydrological Processes, 2002
- American College of Sports Medicine Position Stand on Prevention of Thermal Injuries During Distance RunningMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 1984