Whether to Save a Robot or a Human: On the Ethical and Legal Limits of Protections for Robots
Open Access
- 7 July 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Frontiers Media SA in Frontiers in Robotics and AI
Abstract
Proponents of welcoming robots into the moral circle have presented various approaches to moral patiency under which determining the moral status of robots seems possible. However, even if we recognize robots as having moral standing, how should we situate them in the hierarchy of values? In particular, who should be sacrificed in a moral dilemma–a human or a robot? This paper answers this question with reference to the most popular approaches to moral patiency. However, the conclusions of a survey on moral patiency do not consider another important factor, namely the law. For now, the hierarchy of values is set by law, and we must take that law into consideration when making decisions. I demonstrate that current legal systems prioritize human beings and even force the active protection of humans. Recent studies have suggested that people would hesitate to sacrifice robots in order to save humans, yet doing so could be a crime. This hesitancy is associated with the anthropomorphization of robots, which are becoming more human-like. Robots’ increasing similarity to humans could therefore lead to the endangerment of humans and the criminal responsibility of others. I propose two recommendations in terms of robot design to ensure the supremacy of human life over that of humanoid robots.Funding Information
- Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie
This publication has 53 references indexed in Scilit:
- Robot rights? Towards a social-relational justification of moral considerationEthics and Information Technology, 2010
- Why Computers Can’t Feel PainMinds and Machines, 2009
- The Ethical Treatment of Artificially Conscious RobotsInternational Journal of Social Robotics, 2009
- Artificial agency, consciousness, and the criteria for moral agency: what properties must an artificial agent have to be a moral agent?Ethics and Information Technology, 2008
- The Turing Triage TestEthics and Information Technology, 2004
- On the Morality of Artificial AgentsMinds and Machines, 2004
- Why you can't make a computer that feels painSynthese, 1978
- Self-Defence and the Right to LifeThe Cambridge Law Journal, 1975
- The shallow and the deep, long‐range ecology movement. A summary∗Inquiry, 1973
- Robots: Machines or Artificially Created Life?The Journal of Philosophy, 1964