Working hour characteristics and schedules among nurses in three Nordic countries – a comparative study using payroll data
Open Access
- 28 March 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in BMC Nursing
- Vol. 18 (1), 1-10
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-019-0332-4
Abstract
Organisation of working hour schedules in the Northern European countries are rather similar. EU countries are obliged to adopt national legislation regarding duration of weekly working hours and rest periods. Yet, working hour characteristics and schedules are likely to differ with respect to starting times and duration depending e.g. on culture and tradition. Yet, very little is known about potential differences between shifts and schedules across countries among nursing personel. This knowledge is relevant, since the potential differences in working hour characteristics may influence and possibly explain some of the differences observed in studies of health and safety. The aim of the study was to compare characteristics of working hours and work schedules among nursing personel in three Nordic countries: Denmark, Finland and Norway. The study populations included nursing personnel holding a ≥ 50% position at public hospitals in Denmark (n = 63,678), Finland (n = 18,257) or Norway (n = 1538) in 2013. Objective payroll based registry data with information on daily starting and ending times were used to compare working hour characteristics e.g. starting time, duration of shift, and quick returns (< 11 h between two shifts), as well as work schedules e.g. permanent or 3-shift work between the three countries. Night shifts generally started earlier and lasted longer in Finland (10–11 h starting at 20:00–22:59) than in Norway (10 h starting at 21:00–21:59) and in Denmark (8 h starting at 23:00–23:59). Very long shifts (≥12 h) were more common in Denmark (12%) compared to Finland (8%) and Norway (3%). More employees had many (> 13/year) quick returns in Norway (64%) and Finland (47%) compared to Denmark (16%). The frequency of 3-shift rotation workers was highest in Norway (41%) and lower in Denmark (22%) and Finland (22%). There were few differences across the countries in terms of early morning shifts and (very) long weekly working hours. Despite similar distribution of operational hours among nurses in the three countries, there were differences in working hour characteristics and the use of different types of work schedules. The observed differences may affect health and safety.Keywords
Funding Information
- Nordforsk, Nordic Program on Health and Welfare (74803)
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Breast cancer and circadian disruption from electric lighting in the modern worldCA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2013
- Shift work and vascular events: systematic review and meta-analysisBMJ, 2012
- Implementation of self-rostering (the PRIO-project): effects on working hours, recovery, and healthScandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 2012
- Safety nets or straitjackets? Regulating working time in the Danish, German and American metal industriesEuropean Journal of Industrial Relations, 2012
- Work at night and breast cancer – report on evidence-based options for preventive actionsScandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 2012
- Shift Work as a Risk Factor for Future Type 2 Diabetes: Evidence, Mechanisms, Implications, and Future Research DirectionsPLoS Medicine, 2011
- Night Work and Breast Cancer Risk Among Norwegian Nurses: Assessment by Different Exposure MetricsAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2011
- Sleep Loss and Fatigue in Shift Work and Shift Work DisorderSleep Medicine Clinics, 2009
- "A hard day's night?" The effects of Compressed Working Week interventions on the health and work-life balance of shift workers: a systematic reviewJournal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 2008
- Shifting Schedules: The Health Effects of Reorganizing Shift WorkAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2008