Malpractice Claims of Internal Medicine Involving Diagnostic and System Errors in Japan
Open Access
- 15 September 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Japanese Society of Internal Medicine in Internal Medicine
- Vol. 60 (18), 2919-2925
- https://doi.org/10.2169/internalmedicine.6652-20
Abstract
Objectives Medical litigation resulting from diagnostic errors leads to lawsuits that are time-consuming, expensive, and psychologically burdensome. Few studies have focused on internists, who are more likely to make diagnostic errors than others, with assessments of litigation in terms of system and diagnostic errors. This study explored factors contributing to internists losing lawsuits and examined whether system or diagnostic errors were more important on the outcome. Methods Data regarding 419 lawsuits against internists closed between 1961 and 2017 were extracted from a public Japanese database. Factors affecting litigation outcomes were identified by comparative analysis focusing on system and diagnostic errors, environmental factors, and differences in initial diagnoses. Results Overall, 419 malpractice claims against internists were analyzed. The rate of lawsuits being decided against internists was high (50.1%). The primary cause of litigation was diagnostic errors (213, 54%), followed by system errors (188, 45%). The foremost initial diagnostic error was "no abnormality" (17.2%) followed by ischemic heart disease (9.6%) and malignant neoplasm (8.1%). Following cause-adjustment for loss, system errors were 21.37 times more likely to lead to a loss. Losses were 6.26 times higher for diagnostic error cases, 2.49 times higher for errors occurring at night, and 3.44 times higher when "malignant neoplasm" was the first diagnosis. Conclusions This study found that system errors strongly contributed to internists' losses. Diagnostic errors, night shifts, and initial diagnoses of malignant neoplasms also significantly affected trial outcomes. Administrators must focus on both system errors and diagnostic errors to enhance the safety of patients and reduce internists' risk exposure.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cognitive debiasing 1: origins of bias and theory of debiasingBMJ Quality & Safety, 2013
- Characteristics of paid malpractice claims settled in and out of court in the USA: a retrospective analysisBMJ Open, 2013
- Identifying early warning signs for diagnostic errors in primary care: a qualitative studyBMJ Open, 2012
- Malpractice Risk According to Physician SpecialtyThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2011
- Cognitive error as the most frequent contributory factor in cases of medical injury: A study on verdict's judgment among closed claims in JapanJournal of Hospital Medicine, 2010
- Application of root cause analysis on malpractice claim files related to diagnostic failuresBMJ Quality & Safety, 2010
- An Epidemiologic Study of Closed Emergency Department Malpractice Claims in a National Database of Physician Malpractice InsurersAcademic Emergency Medicine, 2010
- Medical Errors Involving TraineesArchives of Internal Medicine, 2007
- Malpractice Claims Involving Pediatricians: Epidemiology and EtiologyPEDIATRICS, 2007
- Claims, Errors, and Compensation Payments in Medical Malpractice LitigationThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2006