Decreased energy availability during training overload is associated with non-functional overreaching and suppressed ovarian function in female runners
- 1 October 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Canadian Science Publishing in Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism
- Vol. 46 (10), 1179-1188
- https://doi.org/10.1139/apnm-2020-0880
Abstract
Low energy availability (EA) suppresses many physiological processes, including ovarian function in female athletes. Low EA could also predispose athletes to develop a state of overreaching. This study compared the changes in ad libitum energy intake (EI), exercise energy expenditure (ExEE), and EA among runners completing a training overload (TO) phase. We tested the hypothesis that runners becoming overreached would show decreased EA, suppressed ovarian function and plasma leptin, compared with well-adapted (WA) runners. After 1 menstrual cycle (baseline), 16 eumenorrheic runners performed 4 weeks of TO followed by a 2-week recovery (131 ± 3% and 63 ± 6% of baseline running volume, respectively). Seven-day ExEE, EI, running performance (RUNperf) and plasma leptin concentration were assessed for each phase. Salivary estradiol concentration was measured daily. Urinary luteinizing hormone concentration tests confirmed ovulation. Nine runners adapted positively to TO (WA, ΔRUNperf: +4 ± 2%); 7 were non-functionally overreached (NFOR; ΔRUNperf: −9 ± 2%) as RUNperfremained suppressed after the recovery period. WA increased EI during TO, maintaining their baseline EA despite a large increase in ExEE (ΔEA = +1.9 ± 1.3 kcal·kg fat free mass (FFM)−1·d−1, P = 0.17). By contrast, NFOR showed no change in EI, leading to decreased EA (ΔEA = −5.6 ± 2.1 kcal·kg FFM−1·d−1, P = 0.04). Plasma leptin concentration mid-cycle and luteal salivary estradiol concentration decreased in NFOR only. Contrasting with WA, NFOR failed to maintain baseline EA during TO, resulting in poor performance outcomes and suppressed ovarian function. ClinicalTrials.gov no. NCT02224976.Novelty: Runners adapting positively to training overload (TO) increased ad libitum energy intake, maintaining baseline EA and ovarian function through TO. By contrast, NFOR runners failed to increase energy intake, showing suppressed EA and ovarian function during TO.Keywords
This publication has 42 references indexed in Scilit:
- A multidisciplinary approach to overreaching detection in endurance trained athletesJournal of Applied Physiology, 2013
- Energy expenditure and dietary intake during high-volume and low-volume training periods among male endurance athletesApplied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism, 2012
- Bone Microarchitecture Is Impaired in Adolescent Amenorrheic Athletes Compared with Eumenorrheic Athletes and Nonathletic ControlsJournal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 2011
- Carbohydrates for training and competitionJournal of Sports Sciences, 2011
- Individual variability following 12 weeks of supervised exercise: identification and characterization of compensation for exercise-induced weight lossInternational Journal of Obesity, 2007
- Hierarchy of individual calibration levels for heart rate and accelerometry to measure physical activityJournal of Applied Physiology, 2007
- Accuracy of the Actiheart for the assessment of energy expenditure in adultsEuropean Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2007
- Higher dietary carbohydrate content during intensified running training results in better maintenance of performance and mood stateJournal of Applied Physiology, 2004
- Reproducibility, power and validity of visual analogue scales in assessment of appetite sensations in single test meal studiesInternational Journal of Obesity, 2000
- Impact of Energy Intake and Exercise on Resting Metabolic RateSports Medicine, 1990