Efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan in the treatment of heart failure: protocol for a systematic review incorporating unpublished clinical study reports
Open Access
- 10 February 2020
- journal article
- review article
- Published by F1000 Research Ltd in HRB Open Research
Abstract
Background: Sacubitril/valsartan is a first-in-class angiotensin-receptor neprilysin inhibitor used to treat heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. The evidence base for this novel medication is largely based on one pivotal phase III trial which was stopped early due to significant clinical benefits being shown. However potential limitations in the trial design have been highlighted in recent medical literature, necessitating a thorough review of the evidence base for sacubitril/valsartan. Methods: This review will be conducted using the PRISMA reporting guidelines. Relevant randomised controlled trials (RCTs) for sacubitril/valsartan will be systematically searched for in Medline (PubMed), Embase, Cochrane library, Google Scholar, Web of Science, Toxline and Scopus. Clinical trials registries will be searched, as will eight grey literature databases. In addition, unpublished clinical study reports (CSRs) of relevant trials will be requested from the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the Clinical Study Data Request database. Studies will be included if they involve randomising adult patients with heart failure to either sacubitril/valsartan or usual care with either an active comparator or placebo as a control. All relevant clinical and safety outcomes will be reviewed, particularly hospitalisation due to heart failure and cardiovascular mortality. Two reviewers will assess eligibility of selected trials for inclusion. Data extraction will be performed separately for trial publications, clinical trial registries and for CSRs using a piloted form. Methodological quality of included trials from published sources will be assessed separately using the recently updated Cochrane Risk of Bias tool version 2. Narrative synthesis of included studies will be conducted and, if appropriate, meta-analysis for clinical efficacy and safety outcomes. Discussion: This review will collate all available RCT data on sacubitril/valsartan including published and unpublished sources in order to obtain a more complete picture of the evidence base for sacubitril/valsartan. Registration: This protocol has been submitted for registration on PROSPERO.Funding Information
- Health Research Board (CDA-2018-005)
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Angiotensin–Neprilysin Inhibition versus Enalapril in Heart FailureThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2014
- Risk of bias in industry-funded oseltamivir trials: comparison of core reports versus full clinical study reportsBMJ Open, 2014
- Zanamivir for influenza in adults and children: systematic review of clinical study reports and summary of regulatory commentsBMJ, 2014
- Oseltamivir for influenza in adults and children: systematic review of clinical study reports and summary of regulatory commentsBMJ, 2014
- Clinical outcome endpoints in heart failure trials: a European Society of Cardiology Heart Failure Association consensus documentEuropean Journal of Heart Failure, 2013
- Clinical study reports of randomised controlled trials: an exploratory review of previously confidential industry reportsBMJ Open, 2013
- The angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor LCZ696 in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a phase 2 double-blind randomised controlled trialThe Lancet, 2012
- The Imperative to Share Clinical Study Reports: Recommendations from the Tamiflu ExperiencePLoS Medicine, 2012
- GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction—GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tablesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2011
- Selective Publication of Antidepressant Trials and Its Influence on Apparent EfficacyThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2008