Scoring Alternatives for Mental Speed Tests: Measurement Issues and Validity for Working Memory Capacity and the Attentional Blink Effect
Open Access
- 15 October 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Intelligence
- Vol. 6 (4), 47
- https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence6040047
Abstract
Research suggests that the relation of mental speed with working memory capacity (WMC) depends on complexity and scoring methods of speed tasks and the type of task used to assess capacity limits in working memory. In the present study, we included conventional binding/updating measures of WMC as well as rapid serial visual presentation paradigms. The latter allowed for a computation of the attentional blink (AB) effect that was argued to measure capacity limitations at the encoding stage of working memory. Mental speed was assessed with a set of tasks and scored by diverse methods, including response time (RT) based scores, as well as ex-Gaussian and diffusion model parameterization. Relations of latent factors were investigated using structure equation modeling techniques. RT-based scores of mental speed yielded substantial correlations with WMC but only weak relations with the AB effect, while WMC and the AB magnitude were independent. The strength of the speed-WMC relation was shown to depend on task type. Additionally, the increase in predictive validity across RT quantiles changed across task types, suggesting that the worst performance rule (WPR) depends on task characteristics. In contrast to the latter, relations of speed with the AB effect did not change across RT quantiles. Relations of the model parameters were consistently found for the ex-Gaussian tau parameter and the diffusion model drift rate. However, depending on task type, other parameters showed plausible relations as well. The finding that characteristics of mental speed tasks determined the overall strength of relations with WMC, the occurrence of a WPR effect, and the specific pattern of relations of model parameters, implies that mental speed tasks are not exchangeable measurement tools. In spite of reflecting a general factor of mental speed, different speed tasks possess different requirements, supporting the notion of mental speed as a hierarchical construct.Keywords
Funding Information
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SCHM 3235/3-1)
This publication has 69 references indexed in Scilit:
- What is working memory capacity, and how can we measure it?Frontiers in Psychology, 2013
- Further evidence for a multifaceted model of mental speed: Factor structure and validity of computerized measuresLearning and Individual Differences, 2012
- An integrated perspective on the relation between response speed and intelligenceCognition, 2011
- Individuals differ in the attentional blink: Mental speed and intra-subject stability matterIntelligence, 2011
- Individual differences, aging, and IQ in two-choice tasksCognitive Psychology, 2010
- A diffusion model explanation of the worst performance rule for reaction time and IQIntelligence, 2008
- Inconsistency in Reaction Time Across the Life Span.Neuropsychology, 2005
- Modelling age-related changes in information processingThe European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 2001
- Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: An attentional blink?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1992
- A theory of memory retrieval.Psychological Review, 1978