Identification of key qualitative characteristics used to assess the significance of misstatements identified in the financial statements
Open Access
- 28 February 2022
- journal article
- Published by Vilnius University Press in Buhalterinės apskaitos teorija ir praktika
- No. 25,p. 2
- https://doi.org/10.15388/batp.2022.41
Abstract
Financial statements may be misstated for quantitative reasons, such as mathematically incorrect reporting of assets, liabilities or other. Misstatements in the financial statements may also be qualitative. It is the qualitative characteristics of the misstatement that reflect the significance of the misstatement not for mathematical magnitude, but for other reasons, such as changes in profitability trends or illegal activities. To date, auditors have dedicated more attention to the quantitative characteristics of misstatements and the qualitative characteristics have not been adequately assessed. And although the problem is well known to scientists and practitioners, little action has been taken to date. The objective of the study reflected in this article is to identify the key qualitative characteristics that auditors should consider in deciding the significance of the misstatements identified in the financial statements. A list of fifteen key qualitative characteristics was compiled during the study and the completeness of the list was confirmed by an expert survey. The list of key qualitative characteristics will not only assist the auditors in deciding on the significance of the misstatements identified but may also be used in further research to deepen the scientific knowledge of the qualitative characteristics.Keywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Joint Impact of Materiality Guidance and Justification Requirement on Auditors' Planning MaterialityBehavioral Research in Accounting, 2015
- The Influence of Audit Risk and Materiality Guidelines on Auditors’ Planning Materiality AssessmentAccounting and Finance Research, 2015
- Determining Audit Materiality in the Banking Industry – A Knowledge Based ApproachProcedia Economics and Finance, 2014
- An Empirical Investigation of the Influence of Qualitative Risk Factors on Canadian Auditors’ Determination of Performance Materiality*Accounting Perspectives, 2013
- Order Effects And The Audit Materiality Revision ChoiceJournal of Applied Business Research (JABR), 2011
- Effects of Qualitative Factor Salience, Expressed Client Concern, and Qualitative Materiality Thresholds on Auditors' Audit Adjustment Decisions*Contemporary Accounting Research, 2007
- How Many Interviews Are Enough?Field Methods, 2006
- Qualitative Financial Statement Disclosures: Legal and Ethical ConsiderationsBusiness Ethics Quarterly, 2004
- AIMQ: a methodology for information quality assessmentInformation & Management, 2002
- A Temporal Analysis of Earnings Surprises: Profits versus LossesJournal of Accounting Research, 2001