Regarding Arthroscopy
- 1 April 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in JCR: Journal of Clinical Rheumatology
- Vol. 28 (3), 177-181
- https://doi.org/10.1097/rhu.0000000000001802
Abstract
Background/Objective Rheumatologists' interest in arthroscopy began before the 1980s, when many era practitioners began to take up the procedure in earnest. Some of the important players in pre–World War II explorations of arthroscopy were rheumatologists, and the father of modern arthroscopy Makei Watanabe counted many rheumatologists among his postwar students, who were publishing about arthroscopic insights into rheumatic conditions in the 1960s and 1970s. We chose to review this evolution to demonstrate the diverging interests of rheumatologists and orthopedists in arthroscopy and emphasize the chances for reconciliation and cooperation. Methods involve our personal recollection and review of the literature. Results Guidelines for the practice of arthroscopy were published by the American Rheumatism Association (now the American College of Rheumatology) 7 years before similar guidelines appeared from the Arthroscopy Association of North America. American rheumatologists ceased arthroscopy when controlled trials showed no effect in osteoarthritis beyond placebo and biologics for synovitis virtually eliminated situations in which synovectomy might be considered. The research potential of arthroscopy has been realized mainly by European rheumatologists, although the ultrasound-guided biopsy is supplanting arthroscopy as means to secure synovium for investigation, despite the advantages of the latter, such as the ability to obtain larger amounts of tissue, select tissue based on macroscopic appearance, sample multiple area in the same joint, and deliver the potentially therapeutic effect of washout. New miniscopes suitable for office use could restore some of the lagging interest in arthroscopy for investigation. Orthopedists have generally been resistant to rheumatologists doing arthroscopy but would not be sharing any turf with rheumatologists using the miniscope. Conclusions We hope that we orthopedists and rheumatologists could be friends as we enter this new phase of arthroscopy as we use the technique for different purposes.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluating antirheumatic treatments using synovial biopsy: a recommendation for standardisation to be used in clinical trialsAnnals Of The Rheumatic Diseases, 2010
- A History of ArthroscopyArthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery, 2010
- Comparison of efficacy of arthroscopic lavage plus administration of corticosteroids, arthroscopic lavage plus administration of placebo, and joint aspiration plus administration of corticosteroids in arthritis of the knee: A randomized controlled trialArthritis Care & Research, 2006
- Suggested guidelines for the practice of arthroscopic surgeryArthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery, 2005
- Ernst Vaubel, der deutsche Pionier der Arthroskopie 1902-1989Der Unfallchirurg, 2000
- A randomized, controlled trial of arthroscopic surgery versus closed‐needle joint lavage for patients with osteoarthritis of the kneeArthritis & Rheumatism, 1993
- Guidelines for privileges in arthroscopic surgeryArthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery, 1993
- Memories of the early days of arthroscopy: 1965–1975. The formative yearsArthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery, 1987
- A new role for the ara in guiding our destinyArthritis & Rheumatism, 1987
- Memories of the early days of arthroscopyArthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery, 1986