The relationship between individualism and entrepreneurial intention – a Finnish perspective
- 8 May 2017
- journal article
- Published by Emerald in Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy
- Vol. 11 (2), 289-306
- https://doi.org/10.1108/jec-10-2014-0021
Abstract
Purpose: This study aims to analyze the relationship between individualist values and entrepreneurial intentions. Previous surveys have shown that major national differences in entrepreneurial intentions can be observed within Europe and that part of this variation can be explained by cultural values, especially the individualism–collectivism dimension. However, previous findings about the relationship between individualism and entrepreneurship remain contradictory. Design/methodology/approach: This study is a micro-level analysis of the influence of individualistic values. The theoretical framework of the study is based on the theory of planned behavior (Ajzen, 1991, 2001) and theories of individualism advanced by Hofstede (1980) and Triandis and Gelfand (1998). The research data were gathered from a survey of Finnish students (N = 725). Findings: The results show that the relationship between cultural values and entrepreneurial intention is very complex. In contrast to Hofstede (1980), the study assumes individualism and collectivism to be two separate and independent dimensions of cultural values, both of which have a positive, indirect effect on entrepreneurial intention by way of subjective norms and perceived control. Practical implications: Both individualist and collectivist values promote entrepreneurial intentions. From this point of view, general citizenship education, which supports the development of young people’s cultural values, can be seen as a significant element in entrepreneurship education. This suggests an instance of holistic education, the aim of which is for individuals’ autonomy and contestability to be combined with community and collective responsibility. Originality/value: The analysis of Triandis and Gelfand (1998) has not been systematically utilized in the previous studies on entrepreneurial intentions. The findings of this study address not only the influence of psychological factors over entrepreneurial intentions but also the impact of individualist and collectivist values. The results complement the results of previous studies.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- The future of research on entrepreneurial intentionsJournal of Business Research, 2014
- Scientists’ transition to academic entrepreneurship: Economic and psychological determinantsJournal of Economic Psychology, 2012
- Understanding the Individualism-Collectivism Cleavage and Its Effects: Lessons from Cultural PsychologyPublished by Springer Science and Business Media LLC ,2012
- Two forms of community entrepreneurship in Finland: Are there differences between Finnish and Sámi reindeer husbandry entrepreneurs?Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 2011
- Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: A meta‐analytic reviewBritish Journal of Social Psychology, 2001
- Nature and Operation of AttitudesAnnual Review of Psychology, 2001
- The Origins of Self‐Employment in Ethno‐cultural Communities: Distinguishing Between Orthodox Entrepreneurship and Reactionary EnterpriseCanadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l'Administration, 1997
- The theory of planned behaviorOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1991
- Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency.American Psychologist, 1982
- Motivation, leadership, and organization: Do American theories apply abroad?Organizational Dynamics, 1980