Clinical equipoise: Why still the gold standard for randomized clinical trials?
- 25 September 2022
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Clinical Ethics
- Vol. 19 (1), 102-112
- https://doi.org/10.1177/14777509221121107
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
Funding Information
- Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (741782)
This publication has 54 references indexed in Scilit:
- Devices and Clinical TrialsStroke, 2013
- How to write a systematic review of reasonsJournal of Medical Ethics, 2011
- Destabilizing the ‘equipoise’ framework in clinical trials: prioritizing non-exploitation as an ethical framework in clinical researchNursing Philosophy, 2010
- Limits to research risksJournal of Medical Ethics, 2009
- Physician-Related Factors Involved in Patient Decisions to Enroll Onto Cancer Clinical TrialsJournal of Oncology Practice, 2009
- Assessing research risks systematically: the net risks testJournal of Medical Ethics, 2007
- Two Dogmas of Research Ethics and the Integrative Approach to Human-Subjects ResearchJournal of Medicine and Philosophy, 2007
- Freedman's 'Clinical Equipoise' and Sliding-Scale All-Dimensions-Considered Equipoise'Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 2000
- Equipoise: an appropriate standard for ethical review of nursing research?Journal of Advanced Nursing, 2000
- Equipoise and the Ethics of Clinical ResearchThe New England Journal of Medicine, 1987