Early COVID-19 Interventions Failed to Replicate 1918 St. Louis vs. Philadelphia Outcomes in the United States
Open Access
- 15 September 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Frontiers Media SA in Frontiers in Public Health
Abstract
The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has elicited an abrupt pause in the United States in multiple sectors of commerce and social activity. As the US faces this health crisis, the magnitude and rigor of their initial public health response was unprecedented. As a response, the entire nation shutdown at the state-level for the duration of a ~1–3 months. These public health interventions, however, were not arbitrarily decided, but rather, implemented as a result of evidence-based practices. These practices were a result of lessons learned during the 1918 influenza pandemic and the city-level non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) taken across the US. During the 1918 pandemic, two model cities, St. Louis, MO, and Philadelphia, PA, carried out two different approaches to address the spreading disease, which resulted in two distinctly different outcomes. Our group has evaluated the state-level public health response adopted by states across the US, with a focus on New York, California, Florida, and Texas, and compared the effectiveness of reducing the spread of COVID-19. Our assessments show that while the states mentioned above benefited from the implementations of early preventative measures, they inadequately replicated the desired outcomes observed in St. Louis during the 1918 crisis. Our study indicates that there are other factors, including health disparities that may influence the effectiveness of public health interventions applied. Identifying more specific health determinants may help implement targeted interventions aimed at preventing the spread of COVID-19 and improving health equity.This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- An interactive web-based dashboard to track COVID-19 in real timeThe Lancet Infectious Diseases, 2020
- Isolation, quarantine, social distancing and community containment: pivotal role for old-style public health measures in the novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) outbreakJournal of Travel Medicine, 2020
- The effect of public health measures on the 1918 influenza pandemic in U.S. citiesProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2007
- Public health interventions and epidemic intensity during the 1918 influenza pandemicProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2007
- What is the best control strategy for multiple infectious disease outbreaks?Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2006
- The Spanish Influenza of 1918 in St. Louis, MissouriPublic Health Nursing, 2006
- Strategies for mitigating an influenza pandemicNature, 2006
- Nonpharmaceutical Influenza Mitigation Strategies, US Communities, 1918–1920 PandemicEmerging Infectious Diseases, 2006
- Strategies for containing an emerging influenza pandemic in Southeast AsiaNature, 2005
- Transmissibility of 1918 pandemic influenzaNature, 2004