Time for a new deal between neurology and psychoanalysis
- 20 July 2021
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Brain
- Vol. 144 (8), 2228-2230
- https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awab211
Abstract
Neurology, and medicine in general, is torn by opposing tensions: between universality, which is the goal of guidelines and protocols derived from clinical trials, and singularity, which personalized medicine seeks to understand. Centonze and Stampanoni Bassi argue that psychoanalysis could provide a bridge between these domains.This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Mandating COVID-19 VaccinesJAMA, 2021
- Psychoanalysis in combatting mass non-adherence to medical adviceThe Lancet, 2020
- Current Concepts in Diagnosis and Treatment of Functional Neurological DisordersJAMA Neurology, 2018
- The most promising advances in our understanding and treatment of functional (psychogenic) movement disordersParkinsonism & Related Disorders, 2017
- Lacanian Concept of Desire in Analytic Clinic of PsychosisFrontiers in Psychology, 2017
- The homeostatic psyche: Freudian theory and somatic markersJournal of Physiology-Paris, 2010
- Removing Pathogenic Memories: A Neurobiology of PsychotherapyMolecular Neurobiology, 2005
- The Project for a Scientific Psychology (1895): a Freudian anticipation of LTP-memory connection theoryBrain Research Reviews, 2004
- Long-term potentiation and memory processes in the psychological works of Sigmund Freud and in the formation of neuropsychiatric symptomsNeuroscience, 2004
- Biology and the Future of Psychoanalysis: A New Intellectual Framework for Psychiatry RevisitedAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 1999