Accuracy of Emergency Department Clinical Findings for Diagnosis of Coronavirus Disease 2019
Open Access
- 21 May 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Annals of Emergency Medicine
- Vol. 76 (4), 405-412
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2020.05.022
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Correlation of Chest CT and RT-PCR Testing for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China: A Report of 1014 CasesRadiology, 2020
- Clinical course and outcomes of critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a single-centered, retrospective, observational studyThe Lancet Respiratory Medicine, 2020
- Clinical findings in a group of patients infected with the 2019 novel coronavirus (SARS-Cov-2) outside of Wuhan, China: retrospective case seriesBMJ, 2020
- Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, ChinaThe Lancet, 2020
- Predictive criteria for acute heart failure in emergency department patients with acute dyspnoea: the PREDICA studyEuropean Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2019
- Can Emergency Physician Gestalt “Rule In” or “Rule Out” Acute Coronary Syndrome: Validation in a Multicenter Prospective Diagnostic Cohort StudyAcademic Emergency Medicine, 2019
- Comparison of the Unstructured Clinician Gestalt, the Wells Score, and the Revised Geneva Score to Estimate Pretest Probability for Suspected Pulmonary EmbolismAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 2013
- Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and ElaborationPLoS Medicine, 2007
- The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational StudiesPLoS Medicine, 2007