Gradual Drifts, Abrupt Shocks: From Relationship Fractures to Relational Resilience
- 1 January 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Academy of Management in Academy of Management Annals
- Vol. 14 (1), 1-28
- https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2017.0111
Abstract
Although high quality work relationships are essential for organizational effectiveness and employee well-being, they often fracture in the course of organizational life. To better understand how work relationships recover from relationship fractures, we provide an integrative review under the umbrella of relational resilience. We establish a unified definition of relational resilience, and then use two broad attributes – resilience processes and resilience foundations –as an organizing framework for our discussion of relational resilience. Resilience processes describe how fractures are triggered, interpreted and repaired. We review common triggers of relationship fracture and describe two distinct pathways – gradual drifts and abrupt shocks – to fracture; highlight the important role that positive attributional and prosocial sensemaking processes play in facilitating post-fracture repair; and, discuss the process by which fractured relationships are restored or strengthened. Resilience foundations describe the preconditions for successfully engaging in prosocial sensemaking and relational repair. Our review identified the relational foundations critical to positive sensemaking and positive relational attributions, and the reparative foundations critical to relational repair. Finally, we organize insights and future directions around six themes: balancing and realigning emotions, synchronizing attributions and cognitions, contingencies of effective repair, fracture pathways and repair, trajectories of repair, and reciprocal relationships.Keywords
This publication has 208 references indexed in Scilit:
- Resilience and vulnerability of small flexible crisis response teams: implications for training and preparationCognition, Technology & Work, 2013
- Testing the differential effects of changes in psychological contract breach and fulfillmentJournal of Vocational Behavior, 2011
- Understanding the effects of substantive responses on trust following a transgressionOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2011
- When apologies work: How matching apology components to victims’ self-construals facilitates forgivenessOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2010
- In the wake of betrayal: Amends, forgiveness, and the resolution of betrayalPersonal Relationships, 2010
- Emotional and behavioral reactions to social undermining: A closer look at perceived offender motivesOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2009
- The roles of emotion management and perspective taking in individuals’ conflict management styles and disposition to forgiveJournal of Research in Personality, 2008
- Promises and lies: Restoring violated trustOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2006
- Justice in teams: The activation and role of sensemaking in the emergence of justice climatesOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2006
- Trust and communicated attributions in close relationships.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2001