Fragmented Care in the Treatment of Rectal Cancer and Time to Definitive Therapy
- 24 October 2020
- journal article
- conference paper
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Journal of the American College of Surgeons
- Vol. 232 (1), 27-33
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2020.10.017
Abstract
Background The National Accreditation Program for Rectal Cancer (NAPRC) emphasizes a multidisciplinary approach for treating rectal cancer and has developed performance measures to ensure that patients receive standardized care. We hypothesized that rectal cancer patients receiving care at multiple centers would be less likely to receive timely and appropriate care. Study Design A single institution retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database was performed. All patients undergoing proctectomy and ≤1 other treatment modality (eg radiation and/or chemotherapy) for Stage II/III rectal adenocarcinoma were included. Unified care was defined as receiving all modalities of care at our institution, and fragmented care was defined as having at least 1 treatment modality at another institution. Results From 2009 to 2019, 415 patients met inclusion criteria, with 197 (47.5%) receiving fragmented care and 218 (52.5%) receiving unified care. The unified cohort patients were more likely to see a colorectal surgeon before starting treatment (89.0% vs 78.7%, p < 0.01) and start definitive treatment within 60 days of diagnosis (89.0% vs 79.7%, p = 0.01). On adjusted analysis, unified care patients were 2.78 times more likely to see a surgeon before starting treatment (95% CI 1.47–5.24) and 2.63 times more likely to start treatment within 60 days (95% CI 1.35–5.13). There was no difference in 90-day mortality or 5-year disease-free survival. Conclusions This retrospective cohort study suggests patients with rectal cancer receiving fragmented care are at an increased risk of delays in care without any impact on disease-free survival. These findings need to be considered within the context of ongoing regionalization of rectal cancer care to ensure all patients receive optimal care, irrespective of whether care is delivered across multiple institutions.Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Fragmentation in specialist care and stage III colon cancerCancer, 2015
- Patient characteristics associated with the level of patient‐reported care coordination among male patients with colorectal cancer in the Veterans Affairs health care systemCancer, 2015
- Failure of Evidence-Based Cancer Care in the United StatesAnnals of Surgery, 2014
- Geographical Disparities of Rectal Cancer Local Recurrence and OutcomesDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 2013
- Racial Disparities in Stage-Specific Colorectal Cancer Mortality Rates From 1985 to 2008Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2012
- Understanding fragmentation of prostate cancer survivorship careCancer, 2011
- Racial disparities and socioeconomic status in association with survival in a large population‐based cohort of elderly patients with colon cancerCancer, 2007
- Patients' Perceptions of Quality of Care for Colorectal Cancer by Race, Ethnicity, and LanguageJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2005
- Classification of Surgical ComplicationsAnnals of Surgery, 2004
- A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validationJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1987