Testing the Efficacy of Attitudinal Inoculation Videos to Enhance COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptance: Quasi-Experimental Intervention Trial
Open Access
- 20 June 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by JMIR Publications Inc. in JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- Vol. 8 (6), e34615
- https://doi.org/10.2196/34615
Abstract
Journal of Medical Internet Research - International Scientific Journal for Medical Research, Information and Communication on the Internet #Preprint #PeerReviewMe: Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint. Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn. Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period. Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author). Background: Over the course of the COVID-19 pandemic, a variety of COVID-19 related misinformation has spread and been amplified online. The spread of misinformation can influence COVID-19 beliefs and protective actions including vaccine hesitancy. Belief in vaccine misinformation is associated with lower vaccination rates and higher vaccine resistance. Attitudinal inoculation is a preventative approach to combating misinformation and disinformation which leverages the power of narrative, rhetoric, values, and emotion. Objective: This study seeks to test inoculation messages in the form of short video messages to promote resistance against persuasion by COVID-19 vaccine misinformation. Methods: We designed a series of 30-second inoculation videos and conducted a quasi-experimental study to test the use of attitudinal inoculation in a population of individuals who were unvaccinated. The three intervention videos were distinguished by their script design- with Intervention Video 1 focusing on narrative/rhetorical (“Narrative”) presentation of information, Intervention Video 2 focusing on delivering a fact-based information (“Fact”), and Intervention Video 3 using a hybrid design (“Hybrid”). Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) models were used to compare the main effect of intervention group on the three outcome variables: ability to recognize misinformation tactics (“Recognize”, willingness to share misinformation (“Share”), and willingness to take the COVID-19 vaccine (“Willingness”). Results: There were significant effects across all three outcome variables comparing inoculation intervention groups to controls. For the Recognize outcome, the ability to recognize rhetorical strategies, there was a significant intervention group effect (F(3,1929)=8.5, p<0.0001). For the Share outcome, support for sharing the mis-disinformation, the intervention group main effect was statistically significant (F(3,1928)=3.4, p=0.0168). For the Willingness outcome, there was a significant intervention group effect; intervention groups were more willing to get the COVID-19 vaccine compared to controls (F(3,1929)=4.1, p=0.0064). Conclusions: Across all intervention groups, inoculated individuals showed greater resistance to misinformation than their non-inoculated counterparts. Relative to those who were not inoculated, inoculated participants showed significantly greater ability to recognize and identify rhetorical strategies used in misinformation, were less likely to share false information, and had greater willingness to get the COVID-19 vaccine. Attitudinal inoculation delivered through short video messages should be tested in public health messaging campaigns to counter mis-disinformationThis publication has 46 references indexed in Scilit:
- Neutralizing misinformation through inoculation: Exposing misleading argumentation techniques reduces their influencePLOS ONE, 2017
- Inoculating the Public against Misinformation about Climate ChangeGlobal Challenges, 2017
- Persuading Others to Avoid Persuasion: Inoculation Theory and Resistant Health AttitudesFrontiers in Psychology, 2016
- Understanding Innovations in Journalistic Practice: A Field Experiment Examining Motivations for Fact-CheckingJournal of Communication, 2016
- Comparing the Relative Efficacy of Narrative vs Nonnarrative Health Messages in Reducing Health Disparities Using a Randomized TrialAmerican Journal of Public Health, 2015
- A Meta-Analysis of Research on Inoculation TheoryCommunication Monographs, 2010
- Infodemiology and Infoveillance: Framework for an Emerging Set of Public Health Informatics Methods to Analyze Search, Communication and Publication Behavior on the InternetJournal of Medical Internet Research, 2009
- What works best: Objective statistics or a personal testimonial? An assessment of the persuasive effects of different types of message evidence on risk perception.Health Psychology, 2008
- The Effectiveness of Supportive and Refutational Defenses in Immunizing and Restoring Beliefs Against PersuasionSociometry, 1961
- The relative efficacy of various types of prior belief-defense in producing immunity against persuasion.The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1961