Incidence of adverse events in minimally invasive vs open radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer: results of a randomized controlled trial
- 3 October 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Vol. 222 (3), 249.e1-249.e10
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2019.09.036
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
Funding Information
- Medtronic
- National Cancer Institute
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Robot-assisted hysterectomy for endometrial and cervical cancers: a systematic reviewJournal of Robotic Surgery, 2016
- Prognostic and Safety Roles in Laparoscopic Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy in Cervical Cancer: A Meta-analysisJournal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques, 2015
- Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of early stage cervical cancerBMC Cancer, 2015
- Robotic radical hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysisGynecologic Oncology, 2015
- Laparoscopy Compared With Laparotomy for Comprehensive Surgical Staging of Uterine Cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group Study LAP2Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2009
- A Phase III Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Laparoscopic or Robotic Radical Hysterectomy with Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy in Patients with Early Stage Cervical CancerJournal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 2008
- Robotic radical hysterectomy in early‐stage cervical carcinoma patients, comparing results with total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy cases. The future is now?International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, 2007
- Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: Surgical technique and instrumentationGynecologic Oncology, 2007
- Lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy in women with high-risk endometrial cancerGynecologic Oncology, 2007
- RADICAL ABDOMINAL HYSTERECTOMYSurgical Clinics of North America, 2001