Shaping ability of two heat treated rotary NiTi instruments using different kinematics/in vitro study
Open Access
- 16 February 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Bulletin of the National Research Centre
- Vol. 45 (1), 1-6
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s42269-021-00499-w
Abstract
Background: Comparing shaping ability of Azure and Fanta AF One in rotation and reciprocation. This study was conducted on 40 resin blocks, having canal curvatures 30°-angle and of 16-mm length. The blocks were assigned to 4-groups according to the instrument and motion used: Azure/Rotation (A/Rt), Fanta AF one/Rotation (F/Rt), Azure/Reciprocation (A/Rec) and Fanta AF one/Reciprocation (F/Rec). For both systems single file 25, taper 0.06 were used. Digital images were taken before and after instrumentation. Adobe Photoshop was used to overlap post and pre-instrumentation images to assess canal transportation at 1, 4, 7-mm; representing apical, middle and cervical levels respectively. Stopwatch was used to document the time taken for canal preparation. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey post hoc test, used to compare between more than two groups in non-related samples. Results: At the apical level, no statistically significant difference was found between both files in either rotation or reciprocation. However, reciprocation motion showed significantly lower transportation levels in both files. No significant difference was found among groups at the middle and cervical levels. Regarding preparation time, Reciprocation in both groups was significantly longer. Conclusions: The use of reciprocation motion showed minimized apical canal transportation in both files however in longer preparation time.Keywords
Funding Information
- by the authors
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparative analysis of canal transportation and centring ability of three Ni–Ti rotary endodontic systems: Protaper®, MTwo® and Revo-S™, assessed by micro-computed tomographyOdontology, 2014
- Behavior of Nickel-Titanium Instruments Manufactured with Different Thermal TreatmentsJournal of Endodontics, 2014
- Shaping ability of thermomechanically treated files in simulated S-shaped root canalsOpen Journal of Stomatology, 2013
- Cone-beam computed tomography analysis of curved root canals after mechanical preparation with three nickel-titanium rotary instrumentsJournal of Biomedical Research, 2013
- Cyclic fatigue of Reciproc and WaveOne reciprocating instrumentsInternational Endodontic Journal, 2012
- Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of two single‐file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth: Reciproc and WaveOne versus Mtwo and ProTaperInternational Endodontic Journal, 2011
- A metallurgical characterization of ten endodontic Ni‐Ti instruments: assessing the clinical relevance of shape memory and superelastic properties of Ni‐Ti endodontic instrumentsInternational Endodontic Journal, 2010
- Canal preparation using only one Ni‐Ti rotary instrument: preliminary observationsInternational Endodontic Journal, 2007
- Comparison of the Shaping Ability of RaCe and FlexMaster Rotary Nickel-Titanium Systems in Simulated CanalsJournal of Endodontics, 2006
- Comparison of six files to prepare simulated root canals. Part 2International Endodontic Journal, 1992