The perils of plurality rule in democratic presidential systems: A replication and extension
Open Access
- 20 January 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 17 (1), e0262026
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0262026
Abstract
Recent research suggests that country-years where presidents won their previous election with an absolute majority are more likely to be associated with high government respect for human rights, in comparison to country-years where presidents won their previous election by a mere plurality. With this follow-up article, I replicate these findings with a greatly expanded dataset, and I explore whether country-years where presidents have been elected using a majoritarian system are more likely to be associated with high government respect for human rights, in comparison to country-years where presidents have been elected using a non-majoritarian system. Ultimately, I find that not only are presidents elected with a plurality associated with comparatively lower levels of human rights respect, but so are presidents elected via a non-majoritarian system. These findings suggest that policymakers seeking to improve human rights practices may want to consider directing their efforts towards promoting electoral reform with an emphasis on mandating a minimum of a majority in order to win an election.This publication has 49 references indexed in Scilit:
- Transnational mergers and acquisitions: The impact of FDI on human rights, 1981—2006Journal of Peace Research, 2010
- The Executive Toolbox: Building Legislative Support in a Multiparty Presidential RegimePolitical Research Quarterly, 2010
- Electoral Rules and Incentives to Protect Human RightsThe Journal of Politics, 2010
- Good Things to Those Who Wait? National Elections and Government Respect for Human RightsJournal of Peace Research, 2007
- The Presidential CalculusComparative Political Studies, 2006
- Trading Human Rights: How Preferential Trade Agreements Influence Government RepressionInternational Organization, 2005
- The Tyranny of the SupermajorityJournal of Theoretical Politics, 2004
- Minority Governments, Deadlock Situations, and the Survival of Presidential DemocraciesComparative Political Studies, 2002
- The Politics of Coalition Formation and Survival in Multiparty Presidential DemocraciesParty Politics, 2000
- Plurality Versus Majority Election of PresidentsComparative Political Studies, 1994