Risk communication during seismo-volcanic crises: the example of Mayotte, France
Open Access
- 14 June 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Copernicus GmbH in Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences
- Vol. 22 (6), 2001-2029
- https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-2001-2022
Abstract
Population information is a fundamental issue for effective disaster risk reduction. As demonstrated by numerous past and present crises, implementing an effective communication strategy is, however, not a trivial matter. This paper draws lessons from the seismo-volcanic “crisis” that began in the French overseas department of Mayotte in May 2018 and is still ongoing today. Mayotte's case study is interesting for several reasons: (i) although the seismo-volcanic phenomenon itself is associated with moderate impacts, it triggered a social crisis that risk managers themselves qualified as “a communication crisis”, (ii) risks are perceived mostly indirectly by the population, which poses specific challenges, in particular to scientists who are placed at the heart of the risk communication process, and (iii) no emergency planning or monitoring had ever been done in the department of Mayotte with respect to volcanic issues before May 2018, which means that the framing of monitoring and risk management, as well as the strategies adopted to share information with the public, has evolved significantly over time. Our first contribution here is to document the gradual organization of the official response. Our second contribution is an attempt to understand what may have led to the reported “communication crisis”. To that end, we collect and analyze the written information delivered by the main actors of monitoring and risk management to the public over the last 3 years. Finally, we compare its volume, timing, and content with what is known of at-risk populations' information needs. Our results outline the importance of ensuring that communication is not overly technical, that it aims to inform rather than reassure, that it focuses on risk and not only on hazard, and that it provides clues to possible risk scenarios. We issue recommendations for improvement of public information about risks, in the future, in Mayotte but also elsewhere in contexts where comparable geo-crises may happen.This publication has 60 references indexed in Scilit:
- Lessons of L'Aquila for Operational Earthquake ForecastingSeismological Research Letters, 2013
- Social studies of volcanology: knowledge generation and expert advice on active volcanoesBulletin of Volcanology, 2011
- Osmium isotopes in Grande Comore lavas: A new extreme among a spectrum of EM-type mantle endmembersEarth and Planetary Science Letters, 2009
- “Trust me, I'm a Scientist (Not a Developer)”: Perceived Expertise and Motives as Predictors of Trust in Assessment of Risk from Contaminated LandRisk Analysis, 2009
- The issue of trust and its influence on risk communication during a volcanic crisisBulletin of Volcanology, 2007
- The last mile: earthquake risk mitigation assistance in developing countriesPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 2006
- Rising to the Challenges of a Catastrophe: The Emergent and Prosocial Behavior following Hurricane KatrinaThe Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 2006
- Hazard Warning Systems: Review of 20 Years of ProgressNatural Hazards Review, 2000
- The Laki (Skaftár Fires) and Grímsvötn eruptions in 1783–1785Bulletin of Volcanology, 1993
- Age progressive volcanism in the Comores Archipelago, western Indian Ocean and implications for Somali plate tectonicsEarth and Planetary Science Letters, 1982