Gender disparities in middle authorship
Open Access
- 30 March 2021
- journal article
- Published by Leibniz Institute for Psychology (ZPID) in Social Psychological Bulletin
- Vol. 16 (1), 1-22
- https://doi.org/10.32872/spb.2897
Abstract
Women increasingly occupy jobs in psychological research, but continue to face career barriers. One such barrier is fewer authorship and publication opportunities, with women often having fewer first authorships than men. In this research, we examine the overlooked role of middle authorship. Middle authorship contributes to various indices of productivity, while having lower costs. Study 1 looks at five years of authorship in two major journals in social and personality psychology. Study 2 examines publication records of all social psychology faculty in the Netherlands. Both studies find that women have fewer authorship possibilities: In Study 1, women were underrepresented as authors in academic journals, while women in Study 2 had shorter publication lists. More importantly, this tendency was exacerbated for middle authorship positions. Furthermore, the percentage of middle authorship publications were positively related to more publications overall. A focus on middle authorship highlights previously underestimated challenges women continue to face in psychological research.Keywords
This publication has 45 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evidence of bias against girls and women in contexts that emphasize intellectual ability.American Psychologist, 2018
- Gender disparities in high-quality research revealed by Nature Index journalsPLOS ONE, 2018
- Gender differences in scientific collaborations: Women are more egalitarian than menPLOS ONE, 2017
- Some Evidence for a Gender Gap in Personality and Social PsychologySocial Psychological and Personality Science, 2016
- Stereotypes About Gender and SciencePsychology of Women Quarterly, 2016
- Women academics and research productivity: an international comparisonGender and Education, 2015
- Predicting scientific successNature, 2012
- Dearth by a Thousand Cuts?: Accounting for Gender Differences in Top‐Ranked Publication Rates in Social PsychologyJournal of Social Issues, 2012
- How do men and women differ in research collaborations? An analysis of the collaborative motives and strategies of academic researchersResearch Policy, 2011
- Scientists’ collaboration strategies: implications for scientific and technical human capitalResearch Policy, 2004