Cross-Country Individual Participant Analysis of 4.1 Million Singleton Births in 5 Countries with Very High Human Development Index Confirms Known Associations but Provides No Biologic Explanation for 2/3 of All Preterm Births
Open Access
- 13 September 2016
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 11 (9), e0162506
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162506
Abstract
Preterm birth is the most common single cause of perinatal and infant mortality, affecting 15 million infants worldwide each year with global rates increasing. Understanding of risk factors remains poor, and preventive interventions have only limited benefit. Large differences exist in preterm birth rates across high income countries. We hypothesized that understanding the basis for these wide variations could lead to interventions that reduce preterm birth incidence in countries with high rates. We thus sought to assess the contributions of known risk factors for both spontaneous and provider-initiated preterm birth in selected high income countries, estimating also the potential impact of successful interventions due to advances in research, policy and public health, or clinical practice. We analyzed individual patient-level data on 4.1 million singleton pregnancies from four countries with very high human development index (Czech Republic, New Zealand, Slovenia, Sweden) and one comparator U.S. state (California) to determine the specific contribution (adjusting for confounding effects) of 21 factors. Both individual and population-attributable preterm birth risks were determined, as were contributors to cross-country differences. We also assessed the ability to predict preterm birth given various sets of known risk factors. Previous preterm birth and preeclampsia were the strongest individual risk factors of preterm birth in all datasets, with odds ratios of 4.6–6.0 and 2.8–5.7, respectively, for individual women having those characteristics. In contrast, on a population basis, nulliparity and male sex were the two risk factors with the highest impact on preterm birth rates, accounting for 25–50% and 11–16% of excess population attributable risk, respectively (pvery high human development index. The paucity of explicit and currently identified factors amenable to intervention illustrates the limited impact of changes possible through current clinical practice and policy interventions. Our research highlights the urgent need for research into underlying biological causes of preterm birth, which alone are likely to lead to innovative and efficacious interventions.Keywords
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- Risk Factors for Preterm Birth in Five Maternal and Child Health Hospitals in BeijingPLOS ONE, 2012
- Risk Factors for Preterm Birth in an International Prospective Cohort of Nulliparous WomenPLOS ONE, 2012
- National, regional, and worldwide estimates of preterm birth rates in the year 2010 with time trends since 1990 for selected countries: a systematic analysis and implicationsThe Lancet, 2012
- The Enigma of Spontaneous Preterm BirthThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2010
- Constructing Inverse Probability Weights for Marginal Structural ModelsAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2008
- Risk factors associated with preterm birth according to gestational age at birthPharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 2008
- Does fetal sex affect pregnancy outcome?Gender Medicine, 2007
- Racial disparity in the frequency of recurrence of preterm birthAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2007
- Individual and Community Predictors of Preterm Birth and Low Birthweight Along the Rural‐Urban Continuum in Central PennsylvaniaThe Journal of Rural Health, 2007
- A Quality Study of a Medical Birth RegistryScandinavian Journal of Social Medicine, 1990