Academics’ Practice Is Consequential
- 1 September 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Academy of Management in Academy of Management Discoveries
- Vol. 7 (3), 325-327
- https://doi.org/10.5465/amd.2019.0254
Abstract
As academics, we study others’ practices as important and meaningful. Outside accrediting agencies, websites that track the outcomes of our work and news media treat our own work as important and meaningful. However, academics rarely pay scholarly attention to our interactions with each other as sources of scholarly learning, even though we experience these as consequential for our careers and lives. I suggest the value of enhanced scholarly attention to our own practices, and as a stimulus to such scholarship I discuss two related phenomena, the news media’s attention to bullying and harassment in academia and a Facebook group entitled “Reviewer 2 must be stopped”. Both are salient in contemporary academic interactions, both are very pertinent to, and inform understanding of, dynamics that we regularly study, and neither is adequately understood conceptually. Attention to them can benefit both our research and practice.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Elsevier investigates hundreds of peer reviewers for manipulating citationsNature, 2019
- Peer reviewers need a code of conduct tooNature, 2019
- The Call Center Agent’s Performance Paradox: A Mixed-Methods Study of Discourse Strategies and Paradox ResolutionAcademy of Management Discoveries, 2019
- Forging an Identity: An Insider-outsider Study of Processes Involved in the Formation of Organizational IdentityAdministrative Science Quarterly, 2010