Quality assurance audit and corporate governance issues in higher degrees: Toward a framework for enhanced objectivity
Open Access
- 25 July 2017
- journal article
- Published by Virtus Interpress in Corporate Ownership and Control
- Vol. 14 (4), 396-404
- https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv14i4c2art5
Abstract
Quality assurance in service organisations such as the universities is a vital component of the audit process. Therefore, this paper evaluates the quality assurance audit and corporate governance issues in higher degrees. The paper became necessary given rising concern over apparent external assurers’ subjectivity and domination of the higher degree assurance process. The paper inclined on three main objectives, namely to determine how external assurers’ objectivity relate with assurance outcome on higher degrees, to know how the clarity of institutional assurance rubric relate with external assurance outcome and to determine how supervisors’ neutrality relate with external audit assurance outcome on higher degrees. The paper adopted a mixed methodology of qualitative and quantitative approaches, which firstly reviewed the literature on the impugned issues in higher degree quality assurance and thereafter proceeded to use Chi-square statistics to conduct a quantitative analysis of questionnaire responses on higher degree assurance process. Findings suggest that existing quality assurance of higher degrees is asymmetrically inclined more on the external assurer, which thus dominate internal corporate governance process of quality assurance, leaving only a mere ratifying role to the institutional corporate governance process. The Chi-Square statistical finding on all the three objectives showed a P value less than the alpha of 0.05 (PKeywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- The importance of contextual variables when judging fairness: An examination of counterfactual thoughts and fairness theoryOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2011
- Categorical Data AnalysisPublished by Springer Science and Business Media LLC ,2011
- Collaborative Doctoral Education: University-Industry Partnerships for Enhancing Knowledge ExchangeHigher Education Policy, 2010
- ‘You don’t want a smart Alec’: selecting examiners to assess doctoral dissertationsStudies in Higher Education, 2009
- Perceived Transparency and Fairness of the Organ Allocation System and Willingness to Donate Organs: A National StudyAmerican Journal of Transplantation, 2007
- Assessing the PhD: a constructive view of criteriaQuality Assurance in Education, 2003
- The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher EducationPlanet, 2002
- Examining the Doctorate: Institutional policy and the PhD examination process in BritainStudies in Higher Education, 2000
- Examining the examiners: An analysis of examiners' reports on doctoral thesesStudies in Higher Education, 1997
- Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted againBehavioral and Brain Sciences, 1982