Complications of hysteroscopic Essure® sterilisation: report on 4306 procedures performed in a single centre
- 23 February 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
- Vol. 119 (7), 795-799
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03292.x
Abstract
Please cite this paper as: Povedano B, Arjona J, Velasco E, Monserrat J, Lorente J, Castelo‐Branco C. Complications of hysteroscopic Essure® sterilisation: report on 4306 procedures performed in a single centre. BJOG 2012;119:795–799. Objective To analyse the short‐, medium‐ and long‐term complications in women undergoing hysteroscopic tubal sterilisation with the Essure® device. Design Retrospective 7‐year study. Setting Office hysteroscopic unit in a teaching hospital. Sample A total of 4306 women whoe underwent the Essure® sterilisation procedure from 2003 to 2010. Methods Data on the success of the procedure and complications arising from outpatient hysteroscopic sterilisation using the Essure® system were collected from consecutive women undergoing the procedure over a 7‐year period. Main outcome measures Placement rate, successful bilateral tubal occlusion, perioperative adverse events, early postoperative (during the first 3 months of follow‐up) and late complications (after the initial 3 months of follow‐up). Results A total of 4108 (96.8%) women completed the standard 3‐month follow‐up protocol. Only 534 (13%) women had undergone the procedure within the previous year. There were 115 (out of 4306; 2.7%) recorded complications, none of which resulted in the need for hospitalisation or discharge later than 2 hours after the procedure. Vasovagal syncope was the most frequently encountered adverse event, occurring in 85 (2.0%) of 4306 cases. In 19 cases, one device was expelled, with most expulsions (14 out of 19) being detected before or during the 3‐month follow‐up. Conclusions Outpatient hysteroscopic sterilisation using the Essure® system is safe, with a low rate of complications.This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Predictive factors of Essure implant placement failure: prospective, multicenter study of 495 patientsFertility and Sterility, 2010
- Contemporary hysteroscopic methods for female sterilizationInternational Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 2009
- Satisfaction and tolerance with office hysteroscopic tubal sterilizationFertility and Sterility, 2008
- Success rate and patient satisfaction with the Essure™ sterilisation in an outpatient setting: a prospective study of 857 womenBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2007
- The feasibility, success and patient satisfaction associated with outpatient hysteroscopic sterilisationBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2007
- Hysteroscopic sterilisation: is laparoscopic sterilisation a thing of the past?BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2007
- Female sterilisation: a cohort controlled comparative study of ESSURE versus laparoscopic sterilisationBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2005
- Hysteroscopic sterilization using a micro-insert device: results of a multicentre Phase II studyHuman Reproduction, 2003
- Towards evidence‐based laparoscopic entry techniques: clinical problems and dilemmasGynaecological Endoscopy, 1999
- Case-fatality rates for tubal sterilization in U.S. hospitals, 1979 to 1980American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1989