The insoluble problems of books: what does Altmetric.com have to offer?
Open Access
- 31 October 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Emerald in Aslib Journal of Information Management
- Vol. 70 (6), 691-707
- https://doi.org/10.1108/ajim-06-2018-0152
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to analyze the capabilities, functionalities and appropriateness of Altmetric.com as a data source for the bibliometric analysis of books in comparison to PlumX. The authors perform an exploratory analysis on the metrics the Altmetric Explorer for Institutions, platform offers for books. The authors use two distinct data sets of books. On the one hand, the authors analyze the Book Collection included in Altmetric.com. On the other hand, the authors use Clarivate’s Master Book List, to analyze Altmetric.com’s capabilities to download and merge data with external databases. Finally, the authors compare the findings with those obtained in a previous study performed in PlumX. Altmetric.com combines and orderly tracks a set of data sources combined by DOI identifiers to retrieve metadata from books, being Google Books its main provider. It also retrieves information from commercial publishers and from some Open Access initiatives, including those led by university libraries, such as Harvard Library. We find issues with linkages between records and mentions or ISBN discrepancies. Furthermore, the authors find that automatic bots affect greatly Wikipedia mentions to books. The comparison with PlumX suggests that none of these tools provide a complete picture of the social attention generated by books and are rather complementary than comparable tools. This study targets different audience which can benefit from the findings. First, bibliometricians and researchers who seek for alternative sources to develop bibliometric analyses of books, with a special focus on the Social Sciences and Humanities fields. Second, librarians and research managers who are the main clients to which these tools are directed. Third, Altmetric.com itself as well as other altmetric providers who might get a better understanding of the limitations users encounter and improve this promising tool. This is the first study to analyze Altmetric.com’s functionalities and capabilities for providing metric data for books and to compare results from this platform, with those obtained via PlumX.Keywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Opportunities for and limitations of the Book Citation IndexJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2013
- Mapping citation patterns of book chapters in the Book Citation IndexJournal of Informetrics, 2013
- Evaluation of scientific books' publishers in social sciences and humanities: Results of a surveyResearch Evaluation, 2012
- Towards a “Book Publishers Citation Reports”. First approach using the “ Book Citation Index”Revista española de Documentación Científica, 2012
- “Books” and “book chapters” in the book citation index (BKCI) and science citation index (SCI, SoSCI, A&HCI)Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2012
- Assessing the citation impact of books: The role of Google Books, Google Scholar, and ScopusJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2011
- Book reviews in humanities research evaluationsJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2011
- Assessment of humanities and social sciences monographs through their publishers: a review and a study towards a model of evaluationResearch Evaluation, 2009
- Libcitations: A measure for comparative assessment of book publications in the humanities and social sciencesJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2009
- Library Catalog Analysis as a tool in studies of social sciences and humanities: An exploratory study of published book titles in EconomicsJournal of Informetrics, 2009