Moral Decision Making: From Bentham to Veil of Ignorance via Perspective Taking Accessibility
Open Access
- 1 May 2021
- journal article
- review article
- Published by MDPI AG in Behavioral Sciences
- Vol. 11 (5), 66
- https://doi.org/10.3390/bs11050066
Abstract
Making morally sensitive decisions and evaluations pervade many human everyday activities. Philosophers, economists, psychologists and behavioural scientists researching such decision-making typically explore the principles, processes and predictors that constitute human moral decision-making. Crucially, very little research has explored the theoretical and methodological development (supported by empirical evidence) of utilitarian theories of moral decision-making. Accordingly, in this critical review article, we invite the reader on a moral journey from Jeremy Bentham’s utilitarianism to the veil of ignorance reasoning, via a recent theoretical proposal emphasising utilitarian moral behaviour—perspective-taking accessibility (PT accessibility). PT accessibility research revealed that providing participants with access to all situational perspectives in moral scenarios, eliminates (previously reported in the literature) inconsistency between their moral judgements and choices. Moreover, in contrast to any previous theoretical and methodological accounts, moral scenarios/tasks with full PT accessibility provide the participants with unbiased even odds (neither risk averse nor risk seeking) and impartiality. We conclude that the proposed by Martin et al. PT Accessibility (a new type of veil of ignorance with even odds that do not trigger self-interest, risk related preferences or decision biases) is necessary in order to measure humans’ prosocial utilitarian behaviour and promote its societal benefits.This publication has 53 references indexed in Scilit:
- Moral judgments about altruistic self-sacrifice: When philosophical and folk intuitions clashPhilosophical Psychology, 2011
- moral heuristicsBehavioral and Brain Sciences, 2005
- The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment.Psychological Review, 2001
- Perspective Taking: Imagining How Another Feels Versus Imaging How You Would FeelPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1997
- Loss Aversion in Riskless Choice: A Reference-Dependent ModelThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1991
- Rational Choice: A Survey of Contributions from Economics and PhilosophyThe Economic Journal, 1991
- On the Elicitation of Preferences for Alternative TherapiesThe New England Journal of Medicine, 1982
- Stages and Aging in Moral Development--Some SpeculationsThe Gerontologist, 1973
- The Relation of Role Taking to the Development of Moral Judgment in ChildrenChild Development, 1971