Novel method to select meaningful outcomes for evaluation in clinical trials
Open Access
- 7 October 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in BMJ Open Respiratory Research
- Vol. 8 (1), e000877
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2021-000877
Abstract
Background A standardised framework for selecting outcomes for evaluation in trials has been proposed by the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials working group. However, this method does not specify how to ensure that the outcomes that are selected are causally related to the disease and the health intervention being studied. Causal network diagrams may help researchers identify outcomes that are both clinically meaningful and likely to be causally dependent on the intervention, and endpoints that are, in turn, causally dependent on those outcomes. We aimed to (1) develop a generalisable method for selecting outcomes and endpoints in trials and (2) apply this method to select outcomes for evaluation in a trial investigating treatment strategies for pulmonary exacerbations of cystic fibrosis (CF). Methods We conducted a series of online surveys and workshops among people affected by CF. We used a modified Delphi approach to develop a consensus list of important outcomes. A workshop involving domain experts elicited how these outcomes were causally related to the underlying pathophysiological processes. Meaningful outcomes were prioritised based on the extent to which each outcome captured separate rather than common aspects of the underlying pathophysiological process. Results The 10 prioritised outcomes were: breathing difficulty/pain, sputum production/clearance, fatigue, appetite, pain (not related to breathing), motivation/demoralisation, fevers/night sweats, treatment burden, inability to meet personal goals and avoidance of gastrointestinal symptoms. Conclusions This proposed method for selecting meaningful outcomes for evaluation in clinical trials may improve the value of research as a basis for clinical decisions.Funding Information
- National Health and Medical Research Council (GNT1150996)
- Perth Children’s Hospital New Investigator grant (CMcLeod)
- Perth Children's Hospital Foundation (9722)
- Wesfarmers Top up Grant (CMcLeod)
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Control of Confounding and Reporting of Results in Causal Inference Studies. Guidance for Authors from Editors of Respiratory, Sleep, and Critical Care JournalsAnnals of the American Thoracic Society, 2019
- P251 How does the current clinical trials landscape reflect the James Lind Alliance top ten research priorities for CF?Journal of Cystic Fibrosis, 2018
- The top 10 research priorities in cystic fibrosis developed by a partnership between people with CF and healthcare providersThorax, 2017
- EPS1.9 Question CF: a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership in cystic fibrosisJournal of Cystic Fibrosis, 2017
- Increasing value and reducing waste in biomedical research: who's listening?The Lancet, 2015
- Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) initiative: protocol for an international Delphi study to achieve consensus on how to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a ‘core outcome set’Trials, 2014
- Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints in clinical trialsStatistics in Medicine, 2012
- An Introduction to Causal InferenceThe International Journal of Biostatistics, 2010
- The Modified Delphi Technique - A Rotational ModificationJournal of Career and Technical Education, 1999
- Surrogate End Points in Clinical Trials: Are We Being Misled?Annals of Internal Medicine, 1996