ICU Versus High-Dependency Care Unit for Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Nationwide Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study
- 12 January 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Critical Care Medicine
- Vol. 50 (6), 977-985
- https://doi.org/10.1097/ccm.0000000000005440
Abstract
Objectives: To compare the outcomes of patients with acute myocardial infarction who were treated in ICUs versus high-dependency care units (HDUs). Design: A nationwide, propensity score-matched, retrospective cohort study of a national administrative inpatient database in Japan from July 2010 to March 2018. Setting: Six hundred sixty-six acute-care hospitals with ICU and/or HDU beds covering about 75% of all ICU beds and 70% of all HDU beds in Japan. Patients: Adult patients who were hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction and admitted to the ICU or HDU on the day of hospital admission. Propensity score-matching analysis was performed to compare the inhospital mortality between patients treated in the ICU and HDU on the day of hospital admission. Interventions: ICU or HDU admission on the day of hospital admission. Measurements and Main Results: Of 135,142 eligible patients, 89,382 (66%) were admitted to the ICU and 45,760 (34%) were admitted to the HDU on the day of admission. After propensity score matching, there was no statistically significant difference in inhospital mortality between the ICU and HDU groups (5.0% vs 5.5%; difference, –0.5%; 95% CI, –1.0% to 0.1%). In the subgroup analyses, inhospital mortality was significantly lower in the ICU group than that in the HDU group among patients with Killip class IV (25.6% vs 28.4%; difference, –2.9%; 95% CI, –5.4% to –0.3%), patients who underwent intubation (40.0% vs 46.6%; difference, –6.6%; 95% CI, –10.6% to –2.7%), and patients who received mechanical circulatory support (21.8% vs 24.7%; difference, –2.8%; 95% CI, –5.5% to –0.2%). Conclusions: Critical care in the ICU compared with that in the HDU was not associated with reduced inhospital mortality among the entire cohort of patients with acute myocardial infarction but was associated with reduced inhospital mortality among the subsets of patients with Killip class IV, intubation, or mechanical circulatory support.Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- The eye response test alone is sufficient to predict stroke outcome—reintroduction of Japan Coma Scale: a cohort studyBMJ Open, 2013
- Nurse Staffing and Inpatient Hospital MortalityThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2011
- Nurse staffing and patient outcomes in critical care: A concise reviewCritical Care Medicine, 2010
- Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensity‐score matched samplesStatistics in Medicine, 2009
- Prediction of risk of death and myocardial infarction in the six months after presentation with acute coronary syndrome: prospective multinational observational study (GRACE)BMJ, 2006
- Recommendations for the structure, organization, and operation of intensive cardiac care unitsEuropean Heart Journal, 2005
- A Validated Prediction Model for All Forms of Acute Coronary SyndromeJAMA, 2004
- The history of coronary care units.Heart, 1987
- Treatment of myocardial infarction in a coronary care unit: A Two year experience with 250 patientsThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1967
- TREATMENT OF CARDIAC ARREST IN ACUTE MYOCARDIAL ISCHqMIA AND INFARCTION*1The Lancet, 1961