“In barbarous times and in uncivilized countries”
- 9 September 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by John Benjamins Publishing Company in Corpus Studies of Language Through Time
- Vol. 27 (4), 480-505
- https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.22016.ale
Abstract
The ways in which politicians have discussed who, what, and where was considered “uncivilized’” across the past two centuries gives an insight into how speakers in a position of authority classified and constructed the world around them, and how those in power in Britain see the country and themselves. This article uses the Hansard Corpus 1803–2003 of speeches in the UK Parliament alongside data from the Historical Thesaurus of English to analyse diachronic variation in usage of words for persons, places and practices considered uncivil. It proposes new methods and offers quantitative data to describe the period’s shift in political attitudes towards not just the so-called “uncivil” but also the country as a whole.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Rhetorical Culture of the House of Commons after 1918History, 2014
- Empires of Writing: Britain, America and Constitutions, 1776–1848Law and History Review, 2014
- Brown Britain: post-colonial politics and grand strategyInternational Affairs, 2013
- Rethinking the British WorldThe Journal of British Studies, 2013
- Liberalism and Empire in Nineteenth‐Century International LawThe American Historical Review, 2012
- Greece and Rome in the British Empire: Contrasting Role ModelsThe Journal of British Studies, 2012
- How Great is Britain? Power, Responsibility and Britain's Future Global RoleThe British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 2011
- John Stuart Mill on ColoniesPolitical Theory, 2009
- The Hansard hazard: gauging the accuracy of British parliamentary transcriptsCorpora, 2007
- Meaning and Understanding in the History of IdeasHistory and Theory, 1969