Correlation of the Commercial Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Receptor Binding Domain Antibody Test with the Chemiluminescent Reduction Neutralizing Test and Possible Detection of Antibodies to Emerging Variants
Open Access
- 1 December 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Microbiology Spectrum
- Vol. 9 (3), e0056021
- https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.00560-21
Abstract
Serological tests are beneficial for recognizing the immune response against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). To identify protective immunity, optimization of the chemiluminescent reduction neutralizing test (CRNT) is critical. Whether commercial antibody tests have comparable accuracy is unknown. Serum samples were obtained from COVID-19 patients (n = 74), SARS-CoV-2 PCR-negative (n = 179), and suspected healthy individuals (n = 229) before SARS-CoV-2 variants had been detected locally. The convalescent phase was defined as the period after day 10 from disease onset or the episode of close contact. The CRNT using pseudotyped viruses displaying the wild-type (WT) spike protein and a commercial anti-receptor-binding domain (RBD) antibody test were assayed. Serology for the B.1.1.7 and B.1.351 variants was also assayed. Both tests concurred for symptomatic COVID-19 patients in the convalescent phase. They clearly differentiated between patients and suspected healthy individuals (sensitivity: 95.8% and 100%, respectively; specificity: 99.1% and 100%, respectively). Anti-RBD antibody test results correlated with neutralizing titers (r = 0.31, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.22–0.38). Compared with the WT, lower CRNT values were observed for the variants. Of the samples with ≥100 U/mL by the anti-RBD antibody test, 77.8% and 88.9% showed ≥50% neutralization against the B.1.1.7 and the B.1.351 variants, respectively. Exceeding 100 U/mL in the anti-RBD antibody test was associated with neutralization of variants (P < 0.01). The CRNT and commercial anti-RBD antibody test effectively classified convalescent COVID-19 patients. Strong positive results with the anti-RBD antibody test can reflect neutralizing activity against emerging variants. IMPORTANCE This study provides a diagnostic evidence of test validity, which can lead to vaccine efficacy and proof of recovery after COVID-19. It is not easy to know neutralization against SARS-CoV-2 in the clinical laboratory because of technical and biohazard issues. The correlation of the quantitative anti-receptor-binding domain antibody test, which is widely available, with neutralizing test indicates that we can know indirectly the state of acquisition of functional immunity against wild and variant-type viruses in the clinical laboratory.Keywords
Funding Information
- Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (JP20he0622035)
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Viral epitope profiling of COVID-19 patients reveals cross-reactivity and correlates of severityScience, 2020
- High prevalence of pre-existing serological cross-reactivity against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) in sub-Saharan AfricaInternational Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2020
- Persistence and decay of human antibody responses to the receptor binding domain of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in COVID-19 patientsScience Immunology, 2020
- Structural basis of a shared antibody response to SARS-CoV-2Science, 2020
- Antibody Response to Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome‐ Corona Virus 2, Diagnostic and Therapeutic ImplicationsHepatology Communications, 2020
- Humoral Immune Response to SARS-CoV-2American Journal of Clinical Pathology, 2020
- Deep Mutational Scanning of SARS-CoV-2 Receptor Binding Domain Reveals Constraints on Folding and ACE2 BindingCell, 2020
- Convergent antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 in convalescent individualsNature, 2020
- Clinical and immunological assessment of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infectionsNature Medicine, 2020
- A serological assay to detect SARS-CoV-2 seroconversion in humansNature Medicine, 2020