Systematic review and meta-analysis of in situ versus composite bimammary coronary artery bypass grafting: immediate outcomes and 30-day mortality
Open Access
- 7 July 2021
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Silicea - Poligraf, LLC in Russian Journal of Cardiology
- Vol. 26 (2S), 4504
- https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2021-4504
Abstract
Aim. To compare the immediate outcomes and 30-day mortality of in situ bimammary coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) using two internal thoracic arteries (ITAs) versus a composite grafting. Material and methods. We searched PubMed, Google Scholar, and Web of Science databases for a period from 1990 to 2020 for studies comparing in situ bimammary CABG versus composite grafts. The PICO search model was used as follows: patient, intervention, comparison, outcomes. The data were derived by two independent researchers and subjected to a meta-analysis using a random effect. Results. A total of 10 studies were selected for this meta-analysis. Of these, there were 2 randomized controlled trials (n=705), 4 observational propensity score matching studies (n=4267) and 4 unadjusted observational studies (n=3517). With both ITA in situ surgery, fewer distal anastomoses are applied (MD=0,23; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0,15-0,32; p<0,001). But there was no significant difference n myocardial ischemia between groups (3 min with 95% CI, -3,23-9,79; p=0,32). There was no significant difference between groups in the incidence of perioperative stroke (hazard ratio (HR)=0,5; 95% CI; 0,63-1,74; p=0,85 ), myocardial infarction (HR=1,1; 95% CI 0,66-1,85; p=0,71), mediastinitis (HR=0,86; 95% CI; 0,62-1,20; p=0,38), resternotomy due to bleeding (HR=1,29; 95% CI, 0,75-2,21; p=0,36), acute renal injury (HR=1,24; 95% CI, 0, 84-1,84; p=0,29), inhospital mortality (HR=1,08; 95% CI, 0,67-1,75; p=0,75) and 30-day mortality (HR=1,19; 95% CI, 0,81-1,75; p=0,38), but the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation was significantly lower in the group with both ITA in situ surgery (RR=1,23 with 95% CI 1,04-1,44; p=0,01). Conclusion. With composite bimammary CABG, more distal anastomoses with ITA were applied, while the time of myocardial ischemia did not differ between the groups. We found no significant difference in the incidence of perioperative myocardial infarction, stroke, mediastinitis, acute renal injury, resternotomy due to bleeding, inhospital mortality, and 30-day mortality. But at the same time, the HR for postoperative atrial fibrillation was significantly lower in the group with both ITA in situ surgery.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Bilateral Internal Thoracic Artery In Situ Versus Y-Composite Graftings: Long-term OutcomesThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2019
- Total arterial coronary grafting: outcomes, concerns and controversiesVessel Plus, 2019
- Bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting: in situ or composite?Annals of Cardiothoracic Surgery, 2018
- ACC/AATS/AHA/ASE/ASNC/SCAI/SCCT/STS 2017 Appropriate Use Criteria for Coronary Revascularization in Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart DiseaseJournal of Nuclear Cardiology, 2017
- Does the use of a free internal mammary artery graft on the left anterior descending artery compromise long-term survival?†European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 2017
- Impact of pump status and conduit choice in coronary artery bypass: A 15-year follow-up study in 1412 propensity-matched patientsThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2015
- Survival benefit of multiple arterial grafting in a 25-year single-institutional experience: the importance of the third arterial graftEuropean Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 2012
- Benefit of Bilateral Over Single Internal Mammary Artery Grafts for Multiple Coronary Artery Bypass GraftingJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2001
- Bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting: Long-term clinical and angiographic results of in situ versus Y graftsThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2000
- Influence of the Internal-Mammary-Artery Graft on 10-Year Survival and Other Cardiac EventsThe New England Journal of Medicine, 1986