Clinical comparison between trial participants and potentially eligible patients using electronic health record data: A generalizability assessment method
- 25 May 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Journal of Biomedical Informatics
- Vol. 119, 103822
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2021.103822
Abstract
No abstract availableFunding Information
- U.S. National Library of Medicine (5T15LM007079, R01LM009886)
This publication has 63 references indexed in Scilit:
- CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trialsInternational Journal of Surgery, 2012
- Participation in a Clinical Trial Enhances Adherence and Persistence to TreatmentHypertension, 2011
- The Use of Propensity Scores to Assess the Generalizability of Results from Randomized TrialsJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society, 2010
- Use of International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision Clinical Modification Codes and Medication Use Data to Identify Nosocomial Clostridium difficile InfectionInfection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 2009
- Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensity‐score matched samplesStatistics in Medicine, 2009
- Validity of computerized diagnoses, procedures, and drugs for inflammatory bowel disease in a northern California managed care organizationPharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 2009
- Administrative codes combined with medical records based criteria accurately identified bacterial infections among rheumatoid arthritis patientsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2009
- External Validity of Clinical Trials in Acute Myocardial InfarctionArchives of Internal Medicine, 2007
- Factors That Can Affect the External Validity of Randomised Controlled TrialsPLoS Clinical Trials, 2006
- External validity of randomised controlled trials: “To whom do the results of this trial apply?”The Lancet, 2005