Does 3 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging Have Adverse Effect on Cochlear Functions?
Open Access
- 5 October 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by AVES YAYINCILIK A.Ş. in The Journal of International Advanced Otology
- Vol. 17 (5), 412-416
- https://doi.org/10.5152/iao.2021.21091
Abstract
Distortion product otoacoustic emission,magnetic resonance imaging,noise,noise-induced hearing loss,outer hair cell,sensorineural hearing lossKeywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Sensorineural Hearing Loss after Magnetic Resonance ImagingCase Reports in Radiology, 2013
- Otoacoustic emissions, pure-tone audiometry, and self-reported hearingInternational Journal of Audiology, 2012
- Hearing loss after noise exposureAuris Nasus Larynx, 2011
- Informed consent for MRI and fMRI research: Analysis of a sample of Canadian consent documentsBMC Medical Ethics, 2011
- Exploring the relationship between physiological measures of cochlear and brainstem functionClinical Neurophysiology, 2009
- Claustrophobia in MRI: the role of cognitionsMagnetic Resonance Imaging, 2008
- Clinical Practice Guideline: Otitis Media with EffusionOtolaryngology -- Head and Neck Surgery, 2004
- Noise in Magnetic Resonance Imaging: No Risk for Sensorineural Function But Increased Amplitude Variability of Otoacoustic EmissionsThe Laryngoscope, 2003
- Appearance of free radicals in the guinea pig inner ear after noise-induced acoustic traumaEuropean Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 1995
- Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory systemThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1978