Survey on Main Drive Methods Used in Humanoid Robotic Upper Limbs
Open Access
- 15 June 2021
- journal article
- review article
- Published by American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in Thinking Skills and Creativity
- Vol. 2021, 9817487
- https://doi.org/10.34133/2021/9817487
Abstract
Humanoid robotic upper limbs including the robotic hand and robotic arm are widely studied as the important parts of a humanoid robot. A robotic upper limb with light weight and high output can perform more tasks. The drive system is one of the main factors affecting the weight and output of the robotic upper limb, and therefore, the main purpose of this study is to compare and analyze the effects of the different drive methods on the overall structure. In this paper, we first introduce the advantages and disadvantages of the main drive methods such as tendon, gear, link, fluid (hydraulic and pneumatic), belt, chain, and screw drives. The design of the drive system is an essential factor to allow the humanoid robotic upper limb to exhibit the structural features and functions of the human upper limb. Therefore, the specific applications of each drive method on the humanoid robotic limbs are illustrated and briefly analyzed. Meanwhile, we compared the differences in the weight and payload (or grasping force) of the robotic hands and robotic arms with different drive methods. The results showed that the tendon drive system is easier to achieve light weight due to its simple structure, while the gear drive system can achieve a larger torque ratio, which results in a larger output torque. Further, the weight of the actuator accounts for a larger proportion of the total weight, and a reasonable external placement of the actuator is also beneficial to achieve light weight.Keywords
Funding Information
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (20J14065, JP19K12877, JP19K14941, JP18H03761)
This publication has 62 references indexed in Scilit:
- Pneumatic and hydraulic microactuators: a reviewJournal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, 2010
- Objectives, criteria and methods for the design of the SmartHand transradial prosthesisRobotica, 2009
- A Methodology for the Design of Robotic Hands with Multiple FingersInternational Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, 2008
- Socially intelligent robots: dimensions of human–robot interactionPhilosophical Transactions B, 2007
- Design of a cybernetic hand for perception and actionBiological Cybernetics, 2006
- A Seven-degrees-of-freedom Robot-arm Driven by Pneumatic Artificial Muscles for Humanoid RobotsThe International Journal of Robotics Research, 2005
- Dexterous anthropomorphic robot hand with distributed tactile sensor: Gifu hand IIIEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 2002
- NTU Hand: A New Design of Dexterous HandsJournal of Mechanical Design, 1998
- Kinematic analysis and position/force control of the Anthrobot dextrous handIEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics), 1997
- Integrating fuzzy control of the dexterous National Taiwan University (NTU) handIEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 1996