Transurethral Vapor Ablation in Patients with Intermediate-Risk Localized Prostate Cancer
- 1 February 2023
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Mary Ann Liebert Inc in Journal of Endourology
- Vol. 37 (2), 225-232
- https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2022.0452
Abstract
Purpose: We report results of a prospective, multicenter, single-arm study of transurethral vapor ablation (TUVA) of prostate tissue in patients with unilateral, intermediate risk localized prostate cancer. Materials and Methods: Men ≥45 years of age with biopsy confirmed unilateral Gleason Grade Group 2 (GGG2) adenocarcinoma of the prostate, prostate volume 20-80 cc, and PSA ≤15 ng/mL were enrolled. Cystoscopy and transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guidance were used to deliver ~103°C water vapor to prostate zones for unilateral hemi-gland ablation including destruction of cancers suspected by mpMRI and confirmed by biopsy. The primary outcome was device-related serious adverse events (SAEs). At 7 days and 6 months post-procedure, ablation extent was assessed by mpMRI; MRI/TRUS fusion biopsies were completed at 6 months. Quality of life (QOL) was assessed with validated questionnaires. Results: At baseline 8/15 subjects had positive biopsy cores of GGG1 cancer on the targeted treatment side. All subjects successfully underwent a single hemi-gland TUVA procedure. No SAEs occurred. Grade 2 procedure-related AEs included transient urinary retention (n=4) and erectile (n=1) or ejaculatory dysfunction (n=1). At 7 days, mpMRI revealed complete ablation of 14/17 (82%) lesions visible. At 6 months, biopsies showed no Gleason pattern ≥ 4 or ≥ GGG2 cancer on the treated side of prostates in 13/15 (87%) subjects. Ten of 15 (66.7%) subjects had no evidence of cancer; 2/5 biopsy positive subjects had one core each of 3+4 disease, and 3/5 had one core each of 3+3 disease, all ≤5% involvement. Median prostate size was reduced 40.7% and PSA by 58%. Extensive QOL assessments showed on average no appreciable negative effects of treatment. Conclusions: Initial evidence suggests TUVA is safe in men with intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Preliminary results demonstrate the absence of ≥ GGG2 disease on the treated side in 87% of men and a favorable QOL profile.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Targeting the cancer lesion, not the whole prostateTranslational Andrology and Urology, 2020
- Focal Therapy for Prostate Cancer: Recent Advances and Future Directions2020
- Magnetic resonance imaging-guided transurethral ultrasound ablation of prostate tissue in patients with localized prostate cancer: single-center evaluation of 6-month treatment safety and functional outcomes of intensified treatment parametersWorld Journal of Urology, 2019
- Focal Ablation of Early-Stage Prostate CancerUrologic Clinics of North America, 2017
- Erectile and Ejaculatory Function Preserved with Convective Water Vapor Energy Treatment of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Secondary to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Randomized Controlled StudyThe Journal of Sexual Medicine, 2016
- Minimally Invasive Prostate Convective Water Vapor Energy Ablation: A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Study for the Treatment of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Secondary to Benign Prostatic HyperplasiaJournal of Urology, 2015
- Rezūm System Water Vapor Treatment for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms/Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Validation of Convective Thermal Energy Transfer and Characterization With Magnetic Resonance Imaging and 3-Dimensional RenderingsUrology, 2015
- CHEK again: Revisiting the development of CHK1 inhibitors for cancer therapyPharmacology & Therapeutics, 2014
- Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scalePain, 2001
- Development and validation of the expanded prostate cancer index composite (EPIC) for comprehensive assessment of health-related quality of life in men with prostate cancerUrology, 2000