Activity-Based Scheduling of Science Campaigns for the Rosetta Orbiter
- 1 October 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA) in Journal of Aerospace Information Systems
- Vol. 18 (10), 711-727
- https://doi.org/10.2514/1.i010899
Abstract
Rosetta was a European Space Agency (ESA) cornerstone mission that launched in March 2004, exited hibernation in January 2014, entered orbit around the comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko in August 2014, and escorted the comet through September 2016, executing the most detailed study of a comet ever undertaken by humankind. The Rosetta Orbiter had 11 scientific instruments (4 remote sensing) and the Philae Lander to make complementary measurements of the comet nucleus, coma (gas and dust), and surrounding environment. The ESA Rosetta Science Ground Segment (SGS) used a science scheduling system that included an automated scheduling capability to assist in developing science plans for the Rosetta Orbiter. While the automated scheduling was a small portion of the overall SGS as well as the overall scheduling system, this paper focuses on the automated and semi-automated scheduling software (called Automated Scheduling and Planning ENvironment - Rosetta Science Scheduling Component (ASPEN-RSSC)) discussing: 1) the scheduling and constraint checking capabilities of ASPEN-RSSC; and 2) how the software was used pre-exit from hibernation, prelander delivery, and escort phase of the mission; 3) challenges in using the software and lessons learned for future use of automated scheduling technology for future space missions.Keywords
Funding Information
- European Space Agency (Rosetta Mission)
- Jet Propulsion Laboratory (Agile Science, Strategic Research and Technology D)
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration (Advanced Multi Mission Operations System Technolog, Cross Enterprise Technology Development Program, US-ROSETTA Mission)
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- A look towards the future in the handling of space science mission geometryPlanetary and Space Science, 2018
- Managing Spacecraft Memory Buffers with Concurrent Data Collection and DownlinkJournal of Aerospace Information Systems, 2017
- Onboard Autonomy on the Intelligent Payload EXperiment CubeSat MissionJournal of Aerospace Information Systems, 2017
- The science planning process on the Rosetta missionActa Astronautica, 2017
- The Philae Lander: Science planning and operationsActa Astronautica, 2016
- MAPPS: a Science Planning tool supporting the ESA Solar System MissionsPublished by American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA) ,2016
- Three petabytes or bust: planning science observations for NISARPublished by SPIE-Intl Soc Optical Eng ,2016
- Leveraging Multiple Artificial Intelligence Techniques to Improve the Responsiveness in Operations Planning: ASPEN for Orbital ExpressAI Magazine, 2014
- A Mathematical Programming Solution to the Mars Express Memory Dumping ProblemIEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews), 2009
- Ancillary data services of NASA's Navigation and Ancillary Information FacilityPlanetary and Space Science, 1996