Placebo comparator group selection and use in surgical trials: the ASPIRE project including expert workshop
- 1 September 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by National Institute for Health and Care Research in Health Technology Assessment
- Vol. 25 (53), 1-52
- https://doi.org/10.3310/hta25530
Abstract
Background The use of placebo comparisons for randomised trials assessing the efficacy of surgical interventions is increasingly being considered. However, a placebo control is a complex type of comparison group in the surgical setting and, although powerful, presents many challenges. Objectives To provide a summary of knowledge on placebo controls in surgical trials and to summarise any recommendations for designers, evaluators and funders of placebo-controlled surgical trials. Design To carry out a state-of-the-art workshop and produce a corresponding report involving key stakeholders throughout. Setting A workshop to discuss and summarise the existing knowledge and to develop the new guidelines. Results To assess what a placebo control entails and to assess the understanding of this tool in the context of surgery is considered, along with when placebo controls in surgery are acceptable (and when they are desirable). We have considered ethics arguments and regulatory requirements, how a placebo control should be designed, how to identify and mitigate risk for participants in these trials, and how such trials should be carried out and interpreted. The use of placebo controls is justified in randomised controlled trials of surgical interventions provided that there is a strong scientific and ethics rationale. Surgical placebos might be most appropriate when there is poor evidence for the efficacy of the procedure and a justified concern that results of a trial would be associated with a high risk of bias, particularly because of the placebo effect. Conclusions The use of placebo controls is justified in randomised controlled trials of surgical interventions provided that there is a strong scientific and ethics rationale. Feasibility work is recommended to optimise the design and implementation of randomised controlled trials. An outline for best practice was produced in the form of the Applying Surgical Placebo in Randomised Evaluations (ASPIRE) guidelines for those considering the use of a placebo control in a surgical randomised controlled trial. Limitations Although the workshop participants involved international members, the majority of participants were from the UK. Therefore, although every attempt was made to make the recommendations applicable to all health systems, the guidelines may, unconsciously, be particularly applicable to clinical practice in the UK NHS. Future work Future work should evaluate the use of the ASPIRE guidelines in making decisions about the use of a placebo-controlled surgical trial. In addition, further work is required on the appropriate nomenclature to adopt in this space. Funding Funded by the Medical Research Council UK and the National Institute for Health Research as part of the Medical Research Council–National Institute for Health Research Methodology Research programme.Keywords
Funding Information
- Health Technology Assessment Programme (NIHR129830)
- Medical Research Council
This publication has 147 references indexed in Scilit:
- Improving understanding in the research informed consent process: a systematic review of 54 interventions tested in randomized control trialsBMC Medical Ethics, 2013
- A Midurethral Sling to Reduce Incontinence after Vaginal Prolapse RepairThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2012
- Practice, practitioner, or placebo? A multifactorial, mixed-methods randomized controlled trial of acupuncturePain, 2012
- How placebo responses are formed: a learning perspectivePhilosophical Transactions B, 2011
- Placebo studies and ritual theory: a comparative analysis of Navajo, acupuncture and biomedical healingPhilosophical Transactions B, 2011
- Prospective randomized controlled trial of an injectable esophageal prosthesis versus a sham procedure for endoscopic treatment of gastroesophageal reflux diseaseSurgical Endoscopy, 2010
- Effectiveness and Safety of Bronchial Thermoplasty in the Treatment of Severe AsthmaAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2010
- A Randomized Trial of Vertebroplasty for Osteoporotic Spinal FracturesThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2009
- A Randomized Trial of Vertebroplasty for Painful Osteoporotic Vertebral FracturesThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2009
- Endoscopic gastroplication for the treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a randomised, sham-controlled trialGut, 2007