Abstract
On March 11th, 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared COVID-19 as a global pandemic and sent the global economy spiraling into a state of chaos (Adnan, 2020). Higher education like many other industries has had to evolve from the traditional methods which worked in the pre-pandemic world. For most higher education institutions, this meant shifting most if not all classes which were offered face to face to an online environment. This move was not gradual but had to be done essentially overnight to help curve the severity of the virus and keep campuses safe (Dhawan, 2020). Therefore, classes that have never been offered online before were being transitioned to be taught online. This also means that students who may have never taken an online class are now being asked to take an entire load of online classes. Everyone is dealing with different situations, so students, professors, and others involved in higher education have had to try to find the best solutions. This pandemic creates an educational environment that has never been seen before. Therefore, we must embrace previous research and new communication technologies pertaining to online instruction to balance the fears and tensions amidst such crises (Dhawan, 2020). Due to COVID-19, the classroom culture has changed to a culture of high distraction. Students are now learning from home, surrounded by all their entertainment devices. Yet, despite their distracting environment, they are expected to either log in to class and communicate with their teachers and peers through an entertainment device for which classwork can be one small part of the screen or set their own schedule to regularly engage with an asynchronous learning environment. With all these distractions, educators must engage in strategies to keep their students engaged in order to be effective in the COVID-19 teaching landscape. This paper aims to review research on the strategies that have been found to foster student engagement with online classes. Research was reviewed from both information systems/technology as well as communication to make collective conclusions for helping faculty transition into this new culture. Bolliger and Martin (2018) distinguished between three different levels of student engagement. 1. Learner-learner engagement: This includes activities such as discussion boards and other various ways of sharing experiences and resources between students. Notably, a feeling of community and belonging in a class can help students to disclose their experiences allowing students to learn experientially. 2. Learner-instructor engagement: This focuses on communication between the instructor and student, which is an important predictor of student success and achievement. Through modeling positive behaviors and establishing presence, the instructor can foster the learners' sense of community. 3. Learner-content engagement: This consists of the organization of instructional materials and planned activities, which is another component of engagement crucial to student success. In other words, it refers to the time students are involved in reviewing instructional content such as textbook, video, audio, and interactive games. Findings suggest that students and faculty both agreed on the importance of each of these three methods of engagement and that some combination of the three should be used for online learning (Bolliger and Martin, 2018). While all three levels of student engagement are found to be important, it is sometime necessary to prioritize and focus on one or two of these types of engagement depending on the class goals and subject. Students feel that the most valuable elements for engagement in an online class were ensuring instructor presence or personal contact, including relevant course content, and providing frequent communication with the student. Learner-learner engagement can include items such as class introductions or icebreaker activities and collaborative activities. If students are not motivated to engage with one another at the beginning of the semester, the classroom culture will be one of independent study rather than interactivity, so the first 3 weeks are most critical (Kelly and Claus, 2015). Professors must strive to develop a positive rapport between students and engagement in this orientation activity. This means that whatever interactive assignments the students are expected to engage in, so too should the professor to set the example and develop relationships. Being active and encouraging to students as a professor will set an example for how the students should interact with one another. Assignments that foster interactivity should be extended throughout the semester so that students learn from their peers and gain different perspectives on subjects of interest. Grading rubrics should allow students flexibility to expand ideas and should also help to ensure that students are actively interacting with one another in the discussion boards. An alternative to the traditional discussion board model, is hosting discussion boards through Twitter, where students are more likely to engage due to their familiarity with and time naturally spent on the platform (Denker et al., 2018). Learner-instructor engagement includes regular announcements (email reminders), informal question and answer forums, personalized emails, and discussion board postings, posting grading rubrics for assignments, and creating course orientations (Bolliger and Martin, 2018). Communication between instructor and learner is essential to the success of an online class. Personalized communication (where plausible) is preferred and should continue throughout the entire semester to enhance social presence. Above all, it is critical that students receive messages from the instructor that addresses them by name; this both directly increases students' motivation to engage with subject material and indirectly decreases their classroom anxieties through perceived...