Population structure and environmental degradation
Open Access
- 20 October 2019
- journal article
- Published by Bussecon International Academy in Bussecon Review of Social Sciences (2687-2285)
- Vol. 1 (2), 18-27
- https://doi.org/10.36096/brss.v1i2.110
Abstract
The primary objective of this paper is to test the hypothesis that the population age structure could contribute to carbon dioxide emission levels (environmental degradation) in Nigeria. Real income (Gross Domestic Product) was used as another determinant of CO2 emissions to test the EKC hypothesis in this study. Also, the autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) econometric technique was applied in this paper to annual time series data from 1970 to 2018. The results show that age structure’s influence on the environment is significant. As expected, young adults (LOGYONG, i.e., ages 15-64) and children (LOGCHIL, i.e., ages 0-14) are environmentally intensive (due to energy-intensive goods consumed). But the older age group (LOGOLD i.e., ages 65 and above) exert a negative effect. The results of long-term estimation for the population structure-induced EKC hypothesis show that none of the coefficients of economic growth were statistically significant at any of the conventional levels. In other words, this finding did not prove the existence of EKC hypothesis. However, appropriate macroeconomic policies, technological innovations, and institutional developments are very important in maintaining a sound environment in Nigeria.This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Carbon dioxide emissions and economic growth: Panel data evidence from developing countriesEnergy Policy, 2010
- The relationship between income and environment in Turkey: Is there an environmental Kuznets curve?Energy Policy, 2009
- Population and EnvironmentAnnual Review of Environment and Resources, 2007
- Assessing income, population, and technology impacts on CO2 emissions in Canada: Where's the EKC?Ecological Economics, 2006
- Income and emission: A panel data-based cointegration analysisEcological Economics, 2006
- A geographical perspective on poverty–environment interactionsThe Geographical Journal, 2005
- STIRPAT, IPAT and ImPACT: analytic tools for unpacking the driving forces of environmental impactsEcological Economics, 2003
- Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationshipsJournal of Applied Econometrics, 2001
- Environmental Kuznets curves—real progress or passing the buck?: A case for consumption-based approachesEcological Economics, 1998
- Co-Integration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation, and TestingEconometrica, 1987